This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break
to the 6.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cifs-fix-potential-oops-in-cifs_oplock_break.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 994e5d9b45871c168ff9759f280fc87b3658d067
Author: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Aug 10 15:34:21 2023 -0500
cifs: fix potential oops in cifs_oplock_break
[ Upstream commit e8f5f849ffce24490eb9449e98312b66c0dba76f ]
With deferred close we can have closes that race with lease breaks,
and so with the current checks for whether to send the lease response,
oplock_response(), this can mean that an unmount (kill_sb) can occur
just before we were checking if the tcon->ses is valid. See below:
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] RIP: 0010:cifs_oplock_break+0x1f7/0x5b0 [cifs]
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] Code: 7d a8 48 8b 7d c0 c0 e9 02 48 89 45 b8 41 89 cf e8 3e f5 ff ff 4c 89 f7 41 83 e7 01 e8 82 b3 03 f2 49 8b 45 50 48 85 c0 74 5e <48> 83 78 60 00 74 57 45 84 ff 75 52 48 8b 43 98 48 83 eb 68 48 39
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] RSP: 0018:ffffb30607ddbdf8 EFLAGS: 00010206
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] RAX: 632d223d32612022 RBX: ffff97136944b1e0 RCX: 0000000080100009
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000080100009 RDI: ffff97136944b188
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] RBP: ffffb30607ddbe58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc08e0900
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 000000000000000f R12: ffff97136944b138
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] R13: ffff97149147c000 R14: ffff97136944b188 R15: 0000000000000000
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9714f7c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] CR2: 00007fd8de9c7590 CR3: 000000011228e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] Call Trace:
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] <TASK>
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] process_one_work+0x225/0x3d0
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] kthread+0x12a/0x150
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[Fri Aug 4 04:12:50 2023] </TASK>
To fix this change the ordering of the checks before sending the oplock_response
to first check if the openFileList is empty.
Fixes: da787d5b7498 ("SMB3: Do not send lease break acknowledgment if all file handles have been closed")
Suggested-by: Bharath SM <bharathsm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bharath SM <bharathsm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/file.c b/fs/smb/client/file.c
index d554bca7e07eb..4e9d26d4404ab 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/file.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/file.c
@@ -4878,9 +4878,11 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = container_of(work, struct cifsFileInfo,
oplock_break);
struct inode *inode = d_inode(cfile->dentry);
+ struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(inode);
- struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
- struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
+ struct cifs_tcon *tcon;
+ struct TCP_Server_Info *server;
+ struct tcon_link *tlink;
int rc = 0;
bool purge_cache = false, oplock_break_cancelled;
__u64 persistent_fid, volatile_fid;
@@ -4889,6 +4891,12 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
wait_on_bit(&cinode->flags, CIFS_INODE_PENDING_WRITERS,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ tlink = cifs_sb_tlink(cifs_sb);
+ if (IS_ERR(tlink))
+ goto out;
+ tcon = tlink_tcon(tlink);
+ server = tcon->ses->server;
+
server->ops->downgrade_oplock(server, cinode, cfile->oplock_level,
cfile->oplock_epoch, &purge_cache);
@@ -4938,18 +4946,19 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
/*
* MS-SMB2 3.2.5.19.1 and 3.2.5.19.2 (and MS-CIFS 3.2.5.42) do not require
* an acknowledgment to be sent when the file has already been closed.
- * check for server null, since can race with kill_sb calling tree disconnect.
*/
spin_lock(&cinode->open_file_lock);
- if (tcon->ses && tcon->ses->server && !oplock_break_cancelled &&
- !list_empty(&cinode->openFileList)) {
+ /* check list empty since can race with kill_sb calling tree disconnect */
+ if (!oplock_break_cancelled && !list_empty(&cinode->openFileList)) {
spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock);
- rc = tcon->ses->server->ops->oplock_response(tcon, persistent_fid,
- volatile_fid, net_fid, cinode);
+ rc = server->ops->oplock_response(tcon, persistent_fid,
+ volatile_fid, net_fid, cinode);
cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock release rc = %d\n", rc);
} else
spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock);
+ cifs_put_tlink(tlink);
+out:
cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode);
}
