Patch "btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-set-cache_block_group_error-if-we-find-an-error.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 92fb94b69c6accf1e49fff699640fa0ce03dc910 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:20:24 -0400
Subject: btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error

From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 92fb94b69c6accf1e49fff699640fa0ce03dc910 upstream.

We set cache_block_group_error if btrfs_cache_block_group() returns an
error, this is because we could end up not finding space to allocate and
mistakenly return -ENOSPC, and which could then abort the transaction
with the incorrect errno, and in the case of ENOSPC result in a
WARN_ON() that will trip up tests like generic/475.

However there's the case where multiple threads can be racing, one
thread gets the proper error, and the other thread doesn't actually call
btrfs_cache_block_group(), it instead sees ->cached ==
BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR.  Again the result is the same, we fail to allocate
our space and return -ENOSPC.  Instead we need to set
cache_block_group_error to -EIO in this case to make sure that if we do
not make our allocation we get the appropriate error returned back to
the caller.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4411,8 +4411,11 @@ have_block_group:
 			ret = 0;
 		}
 
-		if (unlikely(block_group->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR))
+		if (unlikely(block_group->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR)) {
+			if (!cache_block_group_error)
+				cache_block_group_error = -EIO;
 			goto loop;
+		}
 
 		bg_ret = NULL;
 		ret = do_allocation(block_group, ffe_ctl, &bg_ret);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-6.1/btrfs-don-t-stop-integrity-writeback-too-early.patch
queue-6.1/btrfs-set-cache_block_group_error-if-we-find-an-error.patch
queue-6.1/btrfs-don-t-wait-for-writeback-on-clean-pages-in-extent_write_cache_pages.patch
queue-6.1/btrfs-properly-clear-end-of-the-unreserved-range-in-cow_file_range.patch
queue-6.1/btrfs-wait-for-actual-caching-progress-during-allocation.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux