This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled net: add missing data-race annotations around sk->sk_peek_off to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: net-add-missing-data-race-annotations-around-sk-sk_p.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 9b95590e4bfa31cce58ceb99de433948d7732510 Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jul 28 15:03:16 2023 +0000 net: add missing data-race annotations around sk->sk_peek_off [ Upstream commit 11695c6e966b0ec7ed1d16777d294cef865a5c91 ] sk_getsockopt() runs locklessly, thus we need to annotate the read of sk->sk_peek_off. While we are at it, add corresponding annotations to sk_set_peek_off() and unix_set_peek_off(). Fixes: b9bb53f3836f ("sock: convert sk_peek_offset functions to WRITE_ONCE") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 4dd13d34e4740..61bbe6263f98e 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, if (!sock->ops->set_peek_off) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - v.val = sk->sk_peek_off; + v.val = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off); break; case SO_NOFCS: v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS); @@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_mem_reclaim); int sk_set_peek_off(struct sock *sk, int val) { - sk->sk_peek_off = val; + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off, val); return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_set_peek_off); diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 5b19b6c53a2cb..78fa620a63981 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static int unix_set_peek_off(struct sock *sk, int val) if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->iolock)) return -EINTR; - sk->sk_peek_off = val; + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off, val); mutex_unlock(&u->iolock); return 0;