This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled arm64: Add AMPERE1 to the Spectre-BHB affected list to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: arm64-add-ampere1-to-the-spectre-bhb-affected-list.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 0e5d5ae837c8ce04d2ddb874ec5f920118bd9d31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: D Scott Phillips <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:21:40 -0700 Subject: arm64: Add AMPERE1 to the Spectre-BHB affected list From: D Scott Phillips <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 0e5d5ae837c8ce04d2ddb874ec5f920118bd9d31 upstream. Per AmpereOne erratum AC03_CPU_12, "Branch history may allow control of speculative execution across software contexts," the AMPERE1 core needs the bhb clearing loop to mitigate Spectre-BHB, with a loop iteration count of 11. Signed-off-by: D Scott Phillips <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011022140.432370-1-scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 4 ++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ #define ARM_CPU_IMP_NVIDIA 0x4E #define ARM_CPU_IMP_FUJITSU 0x46 #define ARM_CPU_IMP_HISI 0x48 +#define ARM_CPU_IMP_AMPERE 0xC0 #define ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8 0xD0F #define ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION 0xD00 @@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ #define HISI_CPU_PART_TSV110 0xD01 +#define AMPERE_CPU_PART_AMPERE1 0xAC3 + #define MIDR_CORTEX_A53 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A53) #define MIDR_CORTEX_A57 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57) #define MIDR_CORTEX_A72 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72) @@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ #define MIDR_NVIDIA_CARMEL MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_NVIDIA, NVIDIA_CPU_PART_CARMEL) #define MIDR_FUJITSU_A64FX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_FUJITSU, FUJITSU_CPU_PART_A64FX) #define MIDR_HISI_TSV110 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_HISI, HISI_CPU_PART_TSV110) +#define MIDR_AMPERE1 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_AMPERE, AMPERE_CPU_PART_AMPERE1) /* Fujitsu Erratum 010001 affects A64FX 1.0 and 1.1, (v0r0 and v1r0) */ #define MIDR_FUJITSU_ERRATUM_010001 MIDR_FUJITSU_A64FX --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -1145,6 +1145,10 @@ u8 spectre_bhb_loop_affected(int scope) MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1), {}, }; + static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k11_list[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_AMPERE1), + {}, + }; static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k8_list[] = { MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A72), MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A57), @@ -1155,6 +1159,8 @@ u8 spectre_bhb_loop_affected(int scope) k = 32; else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k24_list)) k = 24; + else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k11_list)) + k = 11; else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k8_list)) k = 8; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-5.4/arm64-add-ampere1-to-the-spectre-bhb-affected-list.patch queue-5.4/arm64-fix-bit-shifting-ub-in-the-midr_cpu_model-macro.patch