This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled perf/x86: Fix lockdep warning in for_each_sibling_event() on SPR to the 6.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: perf-x86-fix-lockdep-warning-in-for_each_sibling_event-on-spr.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 27c68c216ee1f1b086e789a64486e6511e380b8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 11:15:15 -0700 Subject: perf/x86: Fix lockdep warning in for_each_sibling_event() on SPR From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 27c68c216ee1f1b086e789a64486e6511e380b8a upstream. On SPR, the load latency event needs an auxiliary event in the same group to work properly. There's a check in intel_pmu_hw_config() for this to iterate sibling events and find a mem-loads-aux event. The for_each_sibling_event() has a lockdep assert to make sure if it disabled hardirq or hold leader->ctx->mutex. This works well if the given event has a separate leader event since perf_try_init_event() grabs the leader->ctx->mutex to protect the sibling list. But it can cause a problem when the event itself is a leader since the event is not initialized yet and there's no ctx for the event. Actually I got a lockdep warning when I run the below command on SPR, but I guess it could be a NULL pointer dereference. $ perf record -d -e cpu/mem-loads/uP true The code path to the warning is: sys_perf_event_open() perf_event_alloc() perf_init_event() perf_try_init_event() x86_pmu_event_init() hsw_hw_config() intel_pmu_hw_config() for_each_sibling_event() lockdep_assert_event_ctx() We don't need for_each_sibling_event() when it's a standalone event. Let's return the error code directly. Fixes: f3c0eba28704 ("perf: Add a few assertions") Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230704181516.3293665-1-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -3993,6 +3993,13 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct pe struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader; struct perf_event *sibling = NULL; + /* + * When this memload event is also the first event (no group + * exists yet), then there is no aux event before it. + */ + if (leader == event) + return -ENODATA; + if (!is_mem_loads_aux_event(leader)) { for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) { if (is_mem_loads_aux_event(sibling)) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-6.4/perf-x86-fix-lockdep-warning-in-for_each_sibling_event-on-spr.patch