Patch "integrity: Fix possible multiple allocation in integrity_inode_get()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    integrity: Fix possible multiple allocation in integrity_inode_get()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     integrity-fix-possible-multiple-allocation-in-integrity_inode_get.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 9df6a4870dc371136e90330cfbbc51464ee66993 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:42:44 +0800
Subject: integrity: Fix possible multiple allocation in integrity_inode_get()

From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9df6a4870dc371136e90330cfbbc51464ee66993 upstream.

When integrity_inode_get() is querying and inserting the cache, there
is a conditional race in the concurrent environment.

The race condition is the result of not properly implementing
"double-checked locking". In this case, it first checks to see if the
iint cache record exists before taking the lock, but doesn't check
again after taking the integrity_iint_lock.

Fixes: bf2276d10ce5 ("ima: allocating iint improvements")
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v3.10+
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 security/integrity/iint.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/security/integrity/iint.c
+++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
@@ -43,12 +43,10 @@ static struct integrity_iint_cache *__in
 		else if (inode > iint->inode)
 			n = n->rb_right;
 		else
-			break;
+			return iint;
 	}
-	if (!n)
-		return NULL;
 
-	return iint;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -121,10 +119,15 @@ struct integrity_iint_cache *integrity_i
 		parent = *p;
 		test_iint = rb_entry(parent, struct integrity_iint_cache,
 				     rb_node);
-		if (inode < test_iint->inode)
+		if (inode < test_iint->inode) {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
-		else
+		} else if (inode > test_iint->inode) {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+		} else {
+			write_unlock(&integrity_iint_lock);
+			kmem_cache_free(iint_cache, iint);
+			return test_iint;
+		}
 	}
 
 	iint->inode = inode;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/integrity-fix-possible-multiple-allocation-in-integrity_inode_get.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux