This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled tcp: annotate data races in __tcp_oow_rate_limited() to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: tcp-annotate-data-races-in-__tcp_oow_rate_limited.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit fabc6a037bfcf617d85a0ff10452f381dafab0e0 Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jun 29 16:41:50 2023 +0000 tcp: annotate data races in __tcp_oow_rate_limited() [ Upstream commit 998127cdb4699b9d470a9348ffe9f1154346be5f ] request sockets are lockless, __tcp_oow_rate_limited() could be called on the same object from different cpus. This is harmless. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations to avoid a KCSAN report. Fixes: 4ce7e93cb3fe ("tcp: rate limit ACK sent by SYN_RECV request sockets") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 87095d5ecf952..444ad17289277 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -3447,8 +3447,11 @@ static int tcp_ack_update_window(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, u32 static bool __tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, int mib_idx, u32 *last_oow_ack_time) { - if (*last_oow_ack_time) { - s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_jiffies32 - *last_oow_ack_time); + /* Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in this function. */ + u32 val = READ_ONCE(*last_oow_ack_time); + + if (val) { + s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_jiffies32 - val); if (0 <= elapsed && elapsed < sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit) { NET_INC_STATS(net, mib_idx); @@ -3456,7 +3459,10 @@ static bool __tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, int mib_idx, } } - *last_oow_ack_time = tcp_jiffies32; + /* Paired with the prior READ_ONCE() and with itself, + * as we might be lockless. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(*last_oow_ack_time, tcp_jiffies32); return false; /* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */ }