Patch "ARM: 9303/1: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: 9303/1: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings

to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-9303-1-kprobes-avoid-missing-declaration-warning.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit b648318ddaf8c9c7c7a842d6e3b8fde1d8af0729
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jun 2 19:28:42 2023 +0100

    ARM: 9303/1: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings
    
    [ Upstream commit 1b9c3ddcec6a55e15d3e38e7405e2d078db02020 ]
    
    checker_stack_use_t32strd() and kprobe_handler() can be made static since
    they are not used from other files, while coverage_start_registers()
    and __kprobes_test_case() are used from assembler code, and just need
    a declaration to avoid a warning with the global definition.
    
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c:43:18: error: no previous prototype for 'checker_stack_use_t32strd'
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c:236:16: error: no previous prototype for 'kprobe_handler'
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:723:10: error: no previous prototype for 'coverage_start_registers'
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:918:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_start'
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:952:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_end_16'
    arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:967:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_end_32'
    
    Fixes: 6624cf651f1a ("ARM: kprobes: collects stack consumption for store instructions")
    Fixes: 454f3e132d05 ("ARM/kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation")
    Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
index 971119c294741..aa10e5e46ebb2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_imm_0xx(probes_opcode_t insn,
  * Different from other insn uses imm8, the real addressing offset of
  * STRD in T32 encoding should be imm8 * 4. See ARMARM description.
  */
-enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_t32strd(probes_opcode_t insn,
+static enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_t32strd(probes_opcode_t insn,
 		struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
 		const struct decode_header *h)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
index 62da8e2211e4b..0a7090a65bcad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
  * kprobe, and that level is reserved for user kprobe handlers, so we can't
  * risk encountering a new kprobe in an interrupt handler.
  */
-void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct kprobe *p, *cur;
 	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
index cf08cb7267670..1516c340a0766 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
@@ -158,8 +158,6 @@ __arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, int dirty)
 	}
 }
 
-extern void kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
 static void
 optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
index cc237fa9b90fb..1c86c5d980c5b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static const char coverage_register_lookup[16] = {
 	[REG_TYPE_NOSPPCX]	= COVERAGE_ANY_REG | COVERAGE_SP,
 };
 
-unsigned coverage_start_registers(const struct decode_header *h)
+static unsigned coverage_start_registers(const struct decode_header *h)
 {
 	unsigned regs = 0;
 	int i;
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
index 94285203e9f74..459ebda077139 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
@@ -456,3 +456,7 @@ void kprobe_thumb32_test_cases(void);
 #else
 void kprobe_arm_test_cases(void);
 #endif
+
+void __kprobes_test_case_start(void);
+void __kprobes_test_case_end_16(void);
+void __kprobes_test_case_end_32(void);



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux