This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled MIPS: DTS: CI20: Fix ACT8600 regulator node names to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: mips-dts-ci20-fix-act8600-regulator-node-names.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit c5aa8e045a095108423fd50ab26bcee1bc597cea Author: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun Jun 4 16:56:35 2023 +0200 MIPS: DTS: CI20: Fix ACT8600 regulator node names [ Upstream commit 08384e80a70fb1942510ab5f0ce27bad134e634e ] The Device Tree was using invalid node names for the ACT8600 regulators. To be fair, it is not the original committer's fault, as the documentation did gives invalid names as well. In theory, the fix should have been to modify the driver to accept the alternative names. However, even though the act8865 driver spits warnings, the kernel seemed to work fine with what is currently supported upstream. For that reason, I think it is okay to just update the DTS. I removed the "regulator-name" too, since they really didn't bring any information. The node names are enough. Fixes: 73f2b940474d ("MIPS: CI20: DTS: Add I2C nodes") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts index 74d49dc134384..7f98ee0208efb 100644 --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts @@ -219,59 +219,49 @@ &i2c0 { act8600: act8600@5a { compatible = "active-semi,act8600"; reg = <0x5a>; - status = "okay"; regulators { - vddcore: SUDCDC1 { - regulator-name = "DCDC_REG1"; + vddcore: DCDC1 { regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vddmem: SUDCDC2 { - regulator-name = "DCDC_REG2"; + vddmem: DCDC2 { regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vcc_33: SUDCDC3 { - regulator-name = "DCDC_REG3"; + vcc_33: DCDC3 { regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vcc_50: SUDCDC4 { - regulator-name = "SUDCDC_REG4"; + vcc_50: SUDCDC_REG4 { regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vcc_25: LDO_REG5 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG5"; + vcc_25: LDO5 { regulator-min-microvolt = <2500000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2500000>; regulator-always-on; }; - wifi_io: LDO_REG6 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG6"; + wifi_io: LDO6 { regulator-min-microvolt = <2500000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2500000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vcc_28: LDO_REG7 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG7"; + cim_io_28: LDO7 { regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-always-on; }; - vcc_15: LDO_REG8 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG8"; + cim_io_15: LDO8 { regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; regulator-always-on; }; vrtc_18: LDO_REG9 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG9"; /* Despite the datasheet stating 3.3V * for REG9 and the driver expecting that, * REG9 outputs 1.8V. @@ -285,7 +275,6 @@ vrtc_18: LDO_REG9 { regulator-always-on; }; vcc_11: LDO_REG10 { - regulator-name = "LDO_REG10"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; regulator-always-on;