Patch "can: j1939: change j1939_netdev_lock type to mutex" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    can: j1939: change j1939_netdev_lock type to mutex

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     can-j1939-change-j1939_netdev_lock-type-to-mutex.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From cd9c790de2088b0d797dc4d244b4f174f9962554 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:19:09 +0300
Subject: can: j1939: change j1939_netdev_lock type to mutex

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx>

commit cd9c790de2088b0d797dc4d244b4f174f9962554 upstream.

It turns out access to j1939_can_rx_register() needs to be serialized,
otherwise j1939_priv can be corrupted when parallel threads call
j1939_netdev_start() and j1939_can_rx_register() fails. This issue is
thoroughly covered in other commit which serializes access to
j1939_can_rx_register().

Change j1939_netdev_lock type to mutex so that we do not need to remove
GFP_KERNEL from can_rx_register().

j1939_netdev_lock seems to be used in normal contexts where mutex usage
is not prohibited.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Suggested-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526171910.227615-2-pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/can/j1939/main.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void j1939_can_recv(struct sk_buf
 #define J1939_CAN_ID CAN_EFF_FLAG
 #define J1939_CAN_MASK (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG)
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(j1939_netdev_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(j1939_netdev_lock);
 
 static struct j1939_priv *j1939_priv_create(struct net_device *ndev)
 {
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void __j1939_rx_release(struct kr
 	j1939_can_rx_unregister(priv);
 	j1939_ecu_unmap_all(priv);
 	j1939_priv_set(priv->ndev, NULL);
-	spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 }
 
 /* get pointer to priv without increasing ref counter */
@@ -244,9 +244,9 @@ static struct j1939_priv *j1939_priv_get
 {
 	struct j1939_priv *priv;
 
-	spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 	priv = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev);
-	spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 
 	return priv;
 }
@@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(st
 	struct j1939_priv *priv, *priv_new;
 	int ret;
 
-	spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 	priv = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev);
 	if (priv) {
 		kref_get(&priv->rx_kref);
-		spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 		return priv;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 
 	priv = j1939_priv_create(ndev);
 	if (!priv)
@@ -273,20 +273,20 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(st
 	spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks);
 
-	spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 	priv_new = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev);
 	if (priv_new) {
 		/* Someone was faster than us, use their priv and roll
 		 * back our's.
 		 */
 		kref_get(&priv_new->rx_kref);
-		spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 		dev_put(ndev);
 		kfree(priv);
 		return priv_new;
 	}
 	j1939_priv_set(ndev, priv);
-	spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
 
 	ret = j1939_can_rx_register(priv);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(st
 
 void j1939_netdev_stop(struct j1939_priv *priv)
 {
-	kref_put_lock(&priv->rx_kref, __j1939_rx_release, &j1939_netdev_lock);
+	kref_put_mutex(&priv->rx_kref, __j1939_rx_release, &j1939_netdev_lock);
 	j1939_priv_put(priv);
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/can-j1939-change-j1939_netdev_lock-type-to-mutex.patch
queue-5.10/can-j1939-avoid-possible-use-after-free-when-j1939_can_rx_register-fails.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux