This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tipc: do not update mtu if msg_max is too small in mtu negotiation
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tipc-do-not-update-mtu-if-msg_max-is-too-small-in-mt.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit b9de7dda19caf1946d81384acabc2e46b6aa2017
Author: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun May 14 15:52:28 2023 -0400
tipc: do not update mtu if msg_max is too small in mtu negotiation
[ Upstream commit 56077b56cd3fb78e1c8619e29581ba25a5c55e86 ]
When doing link mtu negotiation, a malicious peer may send Activate msg
with a very small mtu, e.g. 4 in Shuang's testing, without checking for
the minimum mtu, l->mtu will be set to 4 in tipc_link_proto_rcv(), then
n->links[bearer_id].mtu is set to 4294967228, which is a overflow of
'4 - INT_H_SIZE - EMSG_OVERHEAD' in tipc_link_mss().
With tipc_link.mtu = 4, tipc_link_xmit() kept printing the warning:
tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 5 0 40 4!
tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 15 0 60 4!
And with tipc_link_entry.mtu 4294967228, a huge skb was allocated in
named_distribute(), and when purging it in tipc_link_xmit(), a crash
was even caused:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x2100001011000dd: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.3.0.neta #19
RIP: 0010:kfree_skb_list_reason+0x7e/0x1f0
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
skb_release_data+0xf9/0x1d0
kfree_skb_reason+0x40/0x100
tipc_link_xmit+0x57a/0x740 [tipc]
tipc_node_xmit+0x16c/0x5c0 [tipc]
tipc_named_node_up+0x27f/0x2c0 [tipc]
tipc_node_write_unlock+0x149/0x170 [tipc]
tipc_rcv+0x608/0x740 [tipc]
tipc_udp_recv+0xdc/0x1f0 [tipc]
udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x33e/0x620
udp_unicast_rcv_skb.isra.72+0x75/0x90
__udp4_lib_rcv+0x56d/0xc20
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x100/0x2d0
This patch fixes it by checking the new mtu against tipc_bearer_min_mtu(),
and not updating mtu if it is too small.
Fixes: ed193ece2649 ("tipc: simplify link mtu negotiation")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index c1e56d1f21b38..dbb1bc722ba9b 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb);
struct tipc_gap_ack_blks *ga = NULL;
bool reply = msg_probe(hdr), retransmitted = false;
- u32 dlen = msg_data_sz(hdr), glen = 0;
+ u32 dlen = msg_data_sz(hdr), glen = 0, msg_max;
u16 peers_snd_nxt = msg_next_sent(hdr);
u16 peers_tol = msg_link_tolerance(hdr);
u16 peers_prio = msg_linkprio(hdr);
@@ -2203,6 +2203,9 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
switch (mtyp) {
case RESET_MSG:
case ACTIVATE_MSG:
+ msg_max = msg_max_pkt(hdr);
+ if (msg_max < tipc_bearer_min_mtu(l->net, l->bearer_id))
+ break;
/* Complete own link name with peer's interface name */
if_name = strrchr(l->name, ':') + 1;
if (sizeof(l->name) - (if_name - l->name) <= TIPC_MAX_IF_NAME)
@@ -2247,8 +2250,8 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
l->peer_session = msg_session(hdr);
l->in_session = true;
l->peer_bearer_id = msg_bearer_id(hdr);
- if (l->mtu > msg_max_pkt(hdr))
- l->mtu = msg_max_pkt(hdr);
+ if (l->mtu > msg_max)
+ l->mtu = msg_max;
break;
case STATE_MSG:
