This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled netfilter: nft_hash: fix nft_hash_deactivate to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: netfilter-nft_hash-fix-nft_hash_deactivate.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 54677226b53aa6edeed6f2d88a7c2d8388807397 Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu May 11 17:41:40 2023 +0200 netfilter: nft_hash: fix nft_hash_deactivate [ backport for 4.14 of 7f4dae2d7f03d2aaf3b7d8343d4509c8d9d7ca9b ] Jindřich Makovička says: The logical OR looks fishy to me. Shouldn't be && there instead? Link: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c index a684234bd229c..eb7db31dd1733 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void *nft_hash_deactivate(const struct net *net, hash = nft_jhash(set, priv, &this->ext); hlist_for_each_entry(he, &priv->table[hash], node) { if (!memcmp(nft_set_ext_key(&this->ext), &elem->key.val, - set->klen) || + set->klen) && nft_set_elem_active(&he->ext, genmask)) { nft_set_elem_change_active(net, set, &he->ext); return he;