Patch "xfs: don't consider future format versions valid" has been added to the 6.2-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xfs: don't consider future format versions valid

to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xfs-don-t-consider-future-format-versions-valid.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From aa88019851a85df80cb77f143758b13aee09e3d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:48:50 +1000
Subject: xfs: don't consider future format versions valid

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit aa88019851a85df80cb77f143758b13aee09e3d9 upstream.

In commit fe08cc504448 we reworked the valid superblock version
checks. If it is a V5 filesystem, it is always valid, then we
checked if the version was less than V4 (reject) and then checked
feature fields in the V4 flags to determine if it was valid.

What we missed was that if the version is not V4 at this point,
we shoudl reject the fs. i.e. the check current treats V6+
filesystems as if it was a v4 filesystem. Fix this.

cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: fe08cc504448 ("xfs: open code sb verifier feature checks")
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ xfs_sb_validate_v5_features(
 }
 
 /*
- * We support all XFS versions newer than a v4 superblock with V2 directories.
+ * We current support XFS v5 formats with known features and v4 superblocks with
+ * at least V2 directories.
  */
 bool
 xfs_sb_good_version(
@@ -86,16 +87,16 @@ xfs_sb_good_version(
 	if (xfs_sb_is_v5(sbp))
 		return xfs_sb_validate_v5_features(sbp);
 
+	/* versions prior to v4 are not supported */
+	if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) != XFS_SB_VERSION_4)
+		return false;
+
 	/* We must not have any unknown v4 feature bits set */
 	if ((sbp->sb_versionnum & ~XFS_SB_VERSION_OKBITS) ||
 	    ((sbp->sb_versionnum & XFS_SB_VERSION_MOREBITSBIT) &&
 	     (sbp->sb_features2 & ~XFS_SB_VERSION2_OKBITS)))
 		return false;
 
-	/* versions prior to v4 are not supported */
-	if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) < XFS_SB_VERSION_4)
-		return false;
-
 	/* V4 filesystems need v2 directories and unwritten extents */
 	if (!(sbp->sb_versionnum & XFS_SB_VERSION_DIRV2BIT))
 		return false;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-6.2/xfs-don-t-consider-future-format-versions-valid.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux