This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfs: fix forkoff miscalculation related to XFS_LITINO(mp)
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfs-fix-forkoff-miscalculation-related-to-xfs_litino-mp.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From ada49d64fb3538144192181db05de17e2ffc3551 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:06:01 -0800
Subject: xfs: fix forkoff miscalculation related to XFS_LITINO(mp)
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit ada49d64fb3538144192181db05de17e2ffc3551 upstream.
Currently, commit e9e2eae89ddb dropped a (int) decoration from
XFS_LITINO(mp), and since sizeof() expression is also involved,
the result of XFS_LITINO(mp) is simply as the size_t type
(commonly unsigned long).
Considering the expression in xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit():
offset = (XFS_LITINO(mp) - bytes) >> 3;
let "bytes" be (int)340, and
"XFS_LITINO(mp)" be (unsigned long)336.
on 64-bit platform, the expression is
offset = ((unsigned long)336 - (int)340) >> 3 =
(int)(0xfffffffffffffffcUL >> 3) = -1
but on 32-bit platform, the expression is
offset = ((unsigned long)336 - (int)340) >> 3 =
(int)(0xfffffffcUL >> 3) = 0x1fffffff
instead.
so offset becomes a large positive number on 32-bit platform, and
cause xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit() returns maxforkoff rather than 0.
Therefore, one result is
"ASSERT(new_size <= XFS_IFORK_SIZE(ip, whichfork));"
assertion failure in xfs_idata_realloc(), which was also the root
cause of the original bugreport from Dennis, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894177
And it can also be manually triggered with the following commands:
$ touch a;
$ setfattr -n user.0 -v "`seq 0 80`" a;
$ setfattr -n user.1 -v "`seq 0 80`" a
on 32-bit platform.
Fix the case in xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit() by bailing out
"XFS_LITINO(mp) < bytes" in advance suggested by Eric and a misleading
comment together with this bugfix suggested by Darrick. It seems the
other users of XFS_LITINO(mp) are not impacted.
Fixes: e9e2eae89ddb ("xfs: only check the superblock version for dinode size calculation")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.7+
Reported-and-tested-by: Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ xfs_attr_copy_value(
*========================================================================*/
/*
- * Query whether the requested number of additional bytes of extended
+ * Query whether the total requested number of attr fork bytes of extended
* attribute space will be able to fit inline.
*
* Returns zero if not, else the di_forkoff fork offset to be used in the
@@ -455,6 +455,12 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(
int maxforkoff;
int offset;
+ /*
+ * Check if the new size could fit at all first:
+ */
+ if (bytes > XFS_LITINO(mp))
+ return 0;
+
/* rounded down */
offset = (XFS_LITINO(mp) - bytes) >> 3;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-5.4/xfs-fix-forkoff-miscalculation-related-to-xfs_litino-mp.patch
