This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: use temporary variable for space_info in btrfs_update_block_group to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: btrfs-use-temporary-variable-for-space_info-in-btrfs.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 43d1f156a65821f05675d62932d8e52b2768e6d0 Author: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Mar 1 16:14:43 2023 -0500 btrfs: use temporary variable for space_info in btrfs_update_block_group [ Upstream commit df384da5a49cace5c5e3100803dfd563fd982f93 ] We do cache->space_info->counter += num_bytes; everywhere in here. This is makes the lines longer than they need to be, and will be especially noticeable when we add the active tracking in, so add a temp variable for the space_info so this is cleaner. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index f40e56d44276d..c70a888bf8bf6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -3336,6 +3336,7 @@ int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, spin_unlock(&info->delalloc_root_lock); while (total) { + struct btrfs_space_info *space_info; bool reclaim = false; cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(info, bytenr); @@ -3343,6 +3344,7 @@ int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = -ENOENT; break; } + space_info = cache->space_info; factor = btrfs_bg_type_to_factor(cache->flags); /* @@ -3357,7 +3359,7 @@ int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, byte_in_group = bytenr - cache->start; WARN_ON(byte_in_group > cache->length); - spin_lock(&cache->space_info->lock); + spin_lock(&space_info->lock); spin_lock(&cache->lock); if (btrfs_test_opt(info, SPACE_CACHE) && @@ -3370,23 +3372,23 @@ int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, old_val += num_bytes; cache->used = old_val; cache->reserved -= num_bytes; - cache->space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; - cache->space_info->bytes_used += num_bytes; - cache->space_info->disk_used += num_bytes * factor; + space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; + space_info->bytes_used += num_bytes; + space_info->disk_used += num_bytes * factor; spin_unlock(&cache->lock); - spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock); + spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); } else { old_val -= num_bytes; cache->used = old_val; cache->pinned += num_bytes; - btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_pinned(info, - cache->space_info, num_bytes); - cache->space_info->bytes_used -= num_bytes; - cache->space_info->disk_used -= num_bytes * factor; + btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_pinned(info, space_info, + num_bytes); + space_info->bytes_used -= num_bytes; + space_info->disk_used -= num_bytes * factor; reclaim = should_reclaim_block_group(cache, num_bytes); spin_unlock(&cache->lock); - spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock); + spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); set_extent_dirty(&trans->transaction->pinned_extents, bytenr, bytenr + num_bytes - 1,