This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets
to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mptcp-use-the-workqueue-to-destroy-unaccepted-sockets.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From b6985b9b82954caa53f862d6059d06c0526254f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 15:49:59 +0100
Subject: mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit b6985b9b82954caa53f862d6059d06c0526254f0 upstream.
Christoph reported a UaF at token lookup time after having
refactored the passive socket initialization part:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __token_bucket_busy+0x253/0x260
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810698d5b0 by task syz-executor653/3198
CPU: 1 PID: 3198 Comm: syz-executor653 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc59af4eaa31c1f6c00c8f1e448ed99a45c66340dd5 #6
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0x91
print_report+0x16a/0x46f
kasan_report+0xad/0x130
__token_bucket_busy+0x253/0x260
mptcp_token_new_connect+0x13d/0x490
mptcp_connect+0x4ed/0x860
__inet_stream_connect+0x80e/0xd90
tcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x3ce/0x710
mptcp_sendmsg+0xff1/0x1a20
inet_sendmsg+0x11d/0x140
__sys_sendto+0x405/0x490
__x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
We need to properly clean-up all the paired MPTCP-level
resources and be sure to release the msk last, even when
the unaccepted subflow is destroyed by the TCP internals
via inet_child_forget().
We can re-use the existing MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW infra,
explicitly checking that for the critical scenario: the
closed subflow is the MPC one, the msk is not accepted and
eventually going through full cleanup.
With such change, __mptcp_destroy_sock() is always called
on msk sockets, even on accepted ones. We don't need anymore
to transiently drop one sk reference at msk clone time.
Please note this commit depends on the parent one:
mptcp: refactor passive socket initialization
Fixes: 58b09919626b ("mptcp: create msk early")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-and-tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/347
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 5 ++++-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2343,7 +2343,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct soc
goto out;
}
- sock_orphan(ssk);
subflow->disposable = 1;
/* if ssk hit tcp_done(), tcp_cleanup_ulp() cleared the related ops
@@ -2351,7 +2350,20 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct soc
* reference owned by msk;
*/
if (!inet_csk(ssk)->icsk_ulp_ops) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!sock_flag(ssk, SOCK_DEAD));
kfree_rcu(subflow, rcu);
+ } else if (msk->in_accept_queue && msk->first == ssk) {
+ /* if the first subflow moved to a close state, e.g. due to
+ * incoming reset and we reach here before inet_child_forget()
+ * the TCP stack could later try to close it via
+ * inet_csk_listen_stop(), or deliver it to the user space via
+ * accept().
+ * We can't delete the subflow - or risk a double free - nor let
+ * the msk survive - or will be leaked in the non accept scenario:
+ * fallback and let TCP cope with the subflow cleanup.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sock_flag(ssk, SOCK_DEAD));
+ mptcp_subflow_drop_ctx(ssk);
} else {
/* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */
if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
@@ -2399,9 +2411,10 @@ static unsigned int mptcp_sync_mss(struc
return 0;
}
-static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
might_sleep();
@@ -2415,7 +2428,15 @@ static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct
if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&ssk->sk_receive_queue))
continue;
- mptcp_close_ssk((struct sock *)msk, ssk, subflow);
+ mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
+ }
+
+ /* if the MPC subflow has been closed before the msk is accepted,
+ * msk will never be accept-ed, close it now
+ */
+ if (!msk->first && msk->in_accept_queue) {
+ sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
+ inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
}
}
@@ -2624,6 +2645,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_str
__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
mptcp_check_data_fin(sk);
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags))
+ __mptcp_close_subflow(sk);
+
/* There is no point in keeping around an orphaned sk timedout or
* closed, but we need the msk around to reply to incoming DATA_FIN,
* even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state
@@ -2639,9 +2663,6 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_str
}
}
- if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags))
- __mptcp_close_subflow(msk);
-
if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags))
__mptcp_retrans(sk);
@@ -3072,6 +3093,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct
msk->local_key = subflow_req->local_key;
msk->token = subflow_req->token;
msk->subflow = NULL;
+ msk->in_accept_queue = 1;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, false);
if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, true);
@@ -3089,8 +3111,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct
security_inet_csk_clone(nsk, req);
bh_unlock_sock(nsk);
- /* keep a single reference */
- __sock_put(nsk);
+ /* note: the newly allocated socket refcount is 2 now */
return nsk;
}
@@ -3146,8 +3167,6 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct
goto out;
}
- /* acquire the 2nd reference for the owning socket */
- sock_hold(new_mptcp_sock);
newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
} else {
@@ -3695,6 +3714,7 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct so
struct sock *newsk = newsock->sk;
set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags);
+ msk->in_accept_queue = 0;
lock_sock(newsk);
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
u8 recvmsg_inq:1,
cork:1,
nodelay:1,
- fastopening:1;
+ fastopening:1,
+ in_accept_queue:1;
int connect_flags;
struct work_struct work;
struct sk_buff *ooo_last_skb;
@@ -666,6 +667,8 @@ void mptcp_subflow_set_active(struct mpt
bool mptcp_subflow_active(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow);
+void mptcp_subflow_drop_ctx(struct sock *ssk);
+
static inline void mptcp_subflow_tcp_fallback(struct sock *sk,
struct mptcp_subflow_context *ctx)
{
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -698,9 +698,10 @@ static bool subflow_hmac_valid(const str
static void mptcp_force_close(struct sock *sk)
{
- /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space */
+ /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space, and refcount is 2 */
inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
sk_common_release(sk);
+ sock_put(sk);
}
static void subflow_ulp_fallback(struct sock *sk,
@@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ static void subflow_ulp_fallback(struct
mptcp_subflow_ops_undo_override(sk);
}
-static void subflow_drop_ctx(struct sock *ssk)
+void mptcp_subflow_drop_ctx(struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *ctx = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
@@ -822,7 +823,7 @@ create_child:
if (new_msk)
mptcp_copy_inaddrs(new_msk, child);
- subflow_drop_ctx(child);
+ mptcp_subflow_drop_ctx(child);
goto out;
}
@@ -913,7 +914,7 @@ out:
return child;
dispose_child:
- subflow_drop_ctx(child);
+ mptcp_subflow_drop_ctx(child);
tcp_rsk(req)->drop_req = true;
inet_csk_prepare_for_destroy_sock(child);
tcp_done(child);
@@ -1863,7 +1864,6 @@ void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct so
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
bool do_cancel_work;
- sock_hold(sk);
lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
next = msk->dl_next;
msk->first = NULL;
@@ -1951,6 +1951,13 @@ static void subflow_ulp_release(struct s
* when the subflow is still unaccepted
*/
release = ctx->disposable || list_empty(&ctx->node);
+
+ /* inet_child_forget() does not call sk_state_change(),
+ * explicitly trigger the socket close machinery
+ */
+ if (!release && !test_and_set_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW,
+ &mptcp_sk(sk)->flags))
+ mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
sock_put(sk);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.2/mptcp-fix-possible-deadlock-in-subflow_error_report.patch
queue-6.2/mptcp-avoid-setting-tcp_close-state-twice.patch
queue-6.2/mptcp-use-the-workqueue-to-destroy-unaccepted-sockets.patch
queue-6.2/mptcp-refactor-passive-socket-initialization.patch
queue-6.2/mptcp-fix-uaf-in-listener-shutdown.patch
queue-6.2/mptcp-fix-lockdep-false-positive-in-mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket.patch
