Patch "riscv: Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK in imprecise unwinding stack mode" has been added to the 6.2-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    riscv: Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK in imprecise unwinding stack mode

to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     riscv-use-read_once_nocheck-in-imprecise-unwinding-s.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 87b41b7fb0c2df96fa921d144cb8b6e8ae59ee88
Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Mar 8 10:16:39 2023 +0100

    riscv: Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK in imprecise unwinding stack mode
    
    [ Upstream commit 76950340cf03b149412fe0d5f0810e52ac1df8cb ]
    
    When CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is unset, the stack unwinding function
    walk_stackframe randomly reads the stack and then, when KASAN is enabled,
    it can lead to the following backtrace:
    
    [    0.000000] ==================================================================
    [    0.000000] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in walk_stackframe+0xa6/0x11a
    [    0.000000] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff81807c40 by task swapper/0
    [    0.000000]
    [    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.2.0-12919-g24203e6db61f #43
    [    0.000000] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
    [    0.000000] Call Trace:
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80007ba8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0x11a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80099ecc>] init_param_lock+0x26/0x2a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80007c4a>] walk_stackframe+0xa2/0x11a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80c49c80>] dump_stack_lvl+0x22/0x36
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80c3783e>] print_report+0x198/0x4a8
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80099ecc>] init_param_lock+0x26/0x2a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80007c4a>] walk_stackframe+0xa2/0x11a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8015f68a>] kasan_report+0x9a/0xc8
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80007c4a>] walk_stackframe+0xa2/0x11a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80007c4a>] walk_stackframe+0xa2/0x11a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8006e99c>] desc_make_final+0x80/0x84
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8009a04e>] stack_trace_save+0x88/0xa6
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80099fc2>] filter_irq_stacks+0x72/0x76
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8006b95e>] devkmsg_read+0x32a/0x32e
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8015ec16>] kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x52
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8006e998>] desc_make_final+0x7c/0x84
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8009a04a>] stack_trace_save+0x84/0xa6
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8015ec52>] kasan_set_track+0x12/0x20
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8015f22e>] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x58/0x5e
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff8015e7ea>] __kmem_cache_create+0x21e/0x39a
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80e133ac>] create_boot_cache+0x70/0x9c
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80e17ab2>] kmem_cache_init+0x6c/0x11e
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80e00fd6>] mm_init+0xd8/0xfe
    [    0.000000] [<ffffffff80e011d8>] start_kernel+0x190/0x3ca
    [    0.000000]
    [    0.000000] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0
    [    0.000000]  and is located at offset 0 in frame:
    [    0.000000]  stack_trace_save+0x0/0xa6
    [    0.000000]
    [    0.000000] This frame has 1 object:
    [    0.000000]  [32, 56) 'c'
    [    0.000000]
    [    0.000000] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
    [    0.000000] page:(____ptrval____) refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x81a07
    [    0.000000] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0)
    [    0.000000] raw: 0000000000001000 ff600003f1e3d150 ff600003f1e3d150 0000000000000000
    [    0.000000] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff
    [    0.000000] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
    [    0.000000]
    [    0.000000] Memory state around the buggy address:
    [    0.000000]  ffffffff81807b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    [    0.000000]  ffffffff81807b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    [    0.000000] >ffffffff81807c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 f3
    [    0.000000]                                            ^
    [    0.000000]  ffffffff81807c80: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    [    0.000000]  ffffffff81807d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    [    0.000000] ==================================================================
    
    Fix that by using READ_ONCE_NOCHECK when reading the stack in imprecise
    mode.
    
    Fixes: 5d8544e2d007 ("RISC-V: Generic library routines and assembly")
    Reported-by: Chathura Rajapaksha <chathura.abeyrathne.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAD7mqryDQCYyJ1gAmtMm8SASMWAQ4i103ptTb0f6Oda=tPY2=A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
    Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308091639.602024-1-alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
index f9a5a7c90ff09..64a9c093aef93 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task,
 	while (!kstack_end(ksp)) {
 		if (__kernel_text_address(pc) && unlikely(!fn(arg, pc)))
 			break;
-		pc = (*ksp++) - 0x4;
+		pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*ksp++) - 0x4;
 	}
 }
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux