This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net: tls: fix possible race condition between do_tls_getsockopt_conf() and do_tls_setsockopt_conf()
to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-tls-fix-possible-race-condition-between-do_tls_g.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit b39f79546c0b3fe959010306ecdd7a5a8427ac58
Author: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:33:44 2023 +0800
net: tls: fix possible race condition between do_tls_getsockopt_conf() and do_tls_setsockopt_conf()
[ Upstream commit 49c47cc21b5b7a3d8deb18fc57b0aa2ab1286962 ]
ctx->crypto_send.info is not protected by lock_sock in
do_tls_getsockopt_conf(). A race condition between do_tls_getsockopt_conf()
and error paths of do_tls_setsockopt_conf() may lead to a use-after-free
or null-deref.
More discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y/ht6gQL+u6fj3dG@hog/
Fixes: 3c4d7559159b ("tls: kernel TLS support")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228023344.9623-1-hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index 3735cb00905df..b32c112984dd9 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -405,13 +405,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(crypto_info_aes_gcm_128->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(crypto_info_aes_gcm_128->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval,
crypto_info_aes_gcm_128,
sizeof(*crypto_info_aes_gcm_128)))
@@ -429,13 +427,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(crypto_info_aes_gcm_256->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_256_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_256_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(crypto_info_aes_gcm_256->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_256_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval,
crypto_info_aes_gcm_256,
sizeof(*crypto_info_aes_gcm_256)))
@@ -451,13 +447,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(aes_ccm_128->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_CCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_CCM_128_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(aes_ccm_128->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_AES_CCM_128_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval, aes_ccm_128, sizeof(*aes_ccm_128)))
rc = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -472,13 +466,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(chacha20_poly1305->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_CHACHA20_POLY1305_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(chacha20_poly1305->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_CHACHA20_POLY1305_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval, chacha20_poly1305,
sizeof(*chacha20_poly1305)))
rc = -EFAULT;
@@ -493,13 +485,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(sm4_gcm_info->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_SM4_GCM_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_SM4_GCM_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(sm4_gcm_info->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_SM4_GCM_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval, sm4_gcm_info, sizeof(*sm4_gcm_info)))
rc = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -513,13 +503,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(sm4_ccm_info->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_SM4_CCM_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_SM4_CCM_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(sm4_ccm_info->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_SM4_CCM_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval, sm4_ccm_info, sizeof(*sm4_ccm_info)))
rc = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -535,13 +523,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(crypto_info_aria_gcm_128->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_128_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(crypto_info_aria_gcm_128->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_128_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval,
crypto_info_aria_gcm_128,
sizeof(*crypto_info_aria_gcm_128)))
@@ -559,13 +545,11 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- lock_sock(sk);
memcpy(crypto_info_aria_gcm_256->iv,
cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_256_SALT_SIZE,
TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_256_IV_SIZE);
memcpy(crypto_info_aria_gcm_256->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
TLS_CIPHER_ARIA_GCM_256_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
- release_sock(sk);
if (copy_to_user(optval,
crypto_info_aria_gcm_256,
sizeof(*crypto_info_aria_gcm_256)))
@@ -614,11 +598,9 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt_no_pad(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
if (len < sizeof(value))
return -EINVAL;
- lock_sock(sk);
value = -EINVAL;
if (ctx->rx_conf == TLS_SW || ctx->rx_conf == TLS_HW)
value = ctx->rx_no_pad;
- release_sock(sk);
if (value < 0)
return value;
@@ -635,6 +617,8 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
{
int rc = 0;
+ lock_sock(sk);
+
switch (optname) {
case TLS_TX:
case TLS_RX:
@@ -651,6 +635,9 @@ static int do_tls_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
break;
}
+
+ release_sock(sk);
+
return rc;
}
