This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_update_inline_data
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-warning-in-ext4_update_inline_data.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 2b96b4a5d9443ca4cad58b0040be455803c05a42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:52:53 +0800
Subject: ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_update_inline_data
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 2b96b4a5d9443ca4cad58b0040be455803c05a42 upstream.
Syzbot found the following issue:
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 without journal. Quota mode: none.
fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-aesni"
fscrypt: AES-256-XTS using implementation "xts-aes-aesni"
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5071 at mm/page_alloc.c:5525 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 5071 Comm: syz-executor263 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003c2f1c0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffc90003c2f220 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003c2f248
RBP: ffffc90003c2f2d8 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003c2f220
R10: fffff52000785e49 R11: 1ffff92000785e44 R12: 0000000000040d40
R13: 1ffff92000785e40 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000785e3c
FS: 0000555556c0d300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f95d5e04138 CR3: 00000000793aa000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:237 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:260 [inline]
__kmalloc_large_node+0x95/0x1e0 mm/slab_common.c:1113
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:956 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xfe/0x190 mm/slab_common.c:981
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:584 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
ext4_update_inline_data+0x236/0x6b0 fs/ext4/inline.c:346
ext4_update_inline_dir fs/ext4/inline.c:1115 [inline]
ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x328/0x990 fs/ext4/inline.c:1307
ext4_add_entry+0x5a4/0xeb0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2385
ext4_add_nondir+0x96/0x260 fs/ext4/namei.c:2772
ext4_create+0x36c/0x560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2817
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x12ac/0x2dd0 fs/namei.c:3711
do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3741
do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1337
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Above issue happens as follows:
ext4_iget
ext4_find_inline_data_nolock ->i_inline_off=164 i_inline_size=60
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
__ext4_mark_inode_dirty
ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea ->i_extra_isize=32 s_want_extra_isize=44
ext4_xattr_shift_entries
->after shift i_inline_off is incorrect, actually is change to 176
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
ext4_update_inline_dir
get_max_inline_xattr_value_size
if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off)
entry = (struct ext4_xattr_entry *)((void *)raw_inode +
EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off);
free += EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size));
->As entry is incorrect, then 'free' may be negative
ext4_update_inline_data
value = kzalloc(len, GFP_NOFS);
-> len is unsigned int, maybe very large, then trigger warning when
'kzalloc()'
To resolve the above issue we need to update 'i_inline_off' after
'ext4_xattr_shift_entries()'. We do not need to set
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag here, since ext4_mark_inode_dirty()
already sets this flag if needed. Setting EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
when it is needed may trigger a BUG_ON in ext4_writepages().
Reported-by: syzbot+d30838395804afc2fa6f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307015253.2232062-3-yebin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -2819,6 +2819,9 @@ shift:
(void *)header, total_ino);
EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize = new_extra_isize;
+ if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode))
+ error = ext4_find_inline_data_nolock(inode);
+
cleanup:
if (error && (mnt_count != le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_mnt_count))) {
ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, "Unable to expand inode %lu. Delete some EAs or run e2fsck.",
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-5.4/ext4-move-where-set-the-may_inline_data-flag-is-set.patch
queue-5.4/ext4-fix-warning-in-ext4_update_inline_data.patch
