Patch "ubifs: Reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budget" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ubifs: Reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budget

to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ubifs-reserve-one-leb-for-each-journal-head-while-do.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit b094c374b7d32b88d27001de099c6901f118977b
Author: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Oct 11 11:47:32 2022 +0800

    ubifs: Reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budget
    
    [ Upstream commit e874dcde1cbf82c786c0e7f2899811c02630cc52 ]
    
    UBIFS calculates available space by c->main_bytes - c->lst.total_used
    (which means non-index lebs' free and dirty space is accounted into
    total available), then index lebs and four lebs (one for gc_lnum, one
    for deletions, two for journal heads) are deducted.
    In following situation, ubifs may get -ENOSPC from make_reservation():
     LEB 84: DATAHD   free 122880 used 1920  dirty 2176  dark 6144
     LEB 110:DELETION free 126976 used 0     dirty 0     dark 6144 (empty)
     LEB 201:gc_lnum  free 126976 used 0     dirty 0     dark 6144
     LEB 272:GCHD     free 77824  used 47672 dirty 1480  dark 6144
     LEB 356:BASEHD   free 0      used 39776 dirty 87200 dark 6144
     OTHERS: index lebs, zero-available non-index lebs
    
    UBIFS calculates the available bytes is 6888 (How to calculate it:
    126976 * 5[remain main bytes] - 1920[used] - 47672[used] - 39776[used] -
    126976 * 1[deletions] - 126976 * 1[gc_lnum] - 126976 * 2[journal heads]
    - 6144 * 5[dark] = 6888) after doing budget, however UBIFS cannot use
    BASEHD's dirty space(87200), because UBIFS cannot find next BASEHD to
    reclaim current BASEHD. (c->bi.min_idx_lebs equals to c->lst.idx_lebs,
    the empty leb won't be found by ubifs_find_free_space(), and dirty index
    lebs won't be picked as gced lebs. All non-index lebs has dirty space
    less then c->dead_wm, non-index lebs won't be picked as gced lebs
    either. So new free lebs won't be produced.). See more details in Link.
    
    To fix it, reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budget.
    
    Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216562
    Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
    Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
index bdb79be6dc0e2..9cb05ef9b9dd9 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
@@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ long long ubifs_calc_available(const struct ubifs_info *c, int min_idx_lebs)
 	subtract_lebs += 1;
 
 	/*
-	 * The GC journal head LEB is not really accessible. And since
-	 * different write types go to different heads, we may count only on
-	 * one head's space.
+	 * Since different write types go to different heads, we should
+	 * reserve one leb for each head.
 	 */
-	subtract_lebs += c->jhead_cnt - 1;
+	subtract_lebs += c->jhead_cnt;
 
 	/* We also reserve one LEB for deletions, which bypass budgeting */
 	subtract_lebs += 1;



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux