Patch "btrfs: free device in btrfs_close_devices for a single device filesystem" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    btrfs: free device in btrfs_close_devices for a single device filesystem

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-free-device-in-btrfs_close_devices-for-a-single-device-filesystem.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 5f58d783fd7823b2c2d5954d1126e702f94bfc4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:47:16 +0800
Subject: btrfs: free device in btrfs_close_devices for a single device filesystem

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 5f58d783fd7823b2c2d5954d1126e702f94bfc4c upstream.

We have this check to make sure we don't accidentally add older devices
that may have disappeared and re-appeared with an older generation from
being added to an fs_devices (such as a replace source device). This
makes sense, we don't want stale disks in our file system. However for
single disks this doesn't really make sense.

I've seen this in testing, but I was provided a reproducer from a
project that builds btrfs images on loopback devices. The loopback
device gets cached with the new generation, and then if it is re-used to
generate a new file system we'll fail to mount it because the new fs is
"older" than what we have in cache.

Fix this by freeing the cache when closing the device for a single device
filesystem. This will ensure that the mount command passed device path is
scanned successfully during the next mount.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.10+
Reported-by: Daan De Meyer <daandemeyer@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ void btrfs_free_device(struct btrfs_devi
 static void free_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
 {
 	struct btrfs_device *device;
+
 	WARN_ON(fs_devices->opened);
 	while (!list_empty(&fs_devices->devices)) {
 		device = list_entry(fs_devices->devices.next,
@@ -1227,9 +1228,22 @@ void btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs
 
 	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
 	close_fs_devices(fs_devices);
-	if (!fs_devices->opened)
+	if (!fs_devices->opened) {
 		list_splice_init(&fs_devices->seed_list, &list);
 
+		/*
+		 * If the struct btrfs_fs_devices is not assembled with any
+		 * other device, it can be re-initialized during the next mount
+		 * without the needing device-scan step. Therefore, it can be
+		 * fully freed.
+		 */
+		if (fs_devices->num_devices == 1) {
+			list_del(&fs_devices->fs_list);
+			free_fs_devices(fs_devices);
+		}
+	}
+
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(fs_devices, tmp, &list, seed_list) {
 		close_fs_devices(fs_devices);
 		list_del(&fs_devices->seed_list);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/btrfs-free-device-in-btrfs_close_devices-for-a-single-device-filesystem.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux