This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bpf: pull before calling skb_postpull_rcsum()
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-pull-before-calling-skb_postpull_rcsum.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 4f6827171291d128efd7c11c395dd9c39ebbd3ab
Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Dec 19 16:47:00 2022 -0800
bpf: pull before calling skb_postpull_rcsum()
[ Upstream commit 54c3f1a81421f85e60ae2eaae7be3727a09916ee ]
Anand hit a BUG() when pulling off headers on egress to a SW tunnel.
We get to skb_checksum_help() with an invalid checksum offset
(commit d7ea0d9df2a6 ("net: remove two BUG() from skb_checksum_help()")
converted those BUGs to WARN_ONs()).
He points out oddness in how skb_postpull_rcsum() gets used.
Indeed looks like we should pull before "postpull", otherwise
the CHECKSUM_PARTIAL fixup from skb_postpull_rcsum() will not
be able to do its job:
if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) < 0)
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
Reported-by: Anand Parthasarathy <anpartha@xxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 6578171a7ff0 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220004701.402165-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index e3cdbd4996e0..a5df0cf46bbf 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -3201,15 +3201,18 @@ static int bpf_skb_generic_push(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 off, u32 len)
static int bpf_skb_generic_pop(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 off, u32 len)
{
+ void *old_data;
+
/* skb_ensure_writable() is not needed here, as we're
* already working on an uncloned skb.
*/
if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, off + len)))
return -ENOMEM;
- skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, skb->data + off, len);
- memmove(skb->data + len, skb->data, off);
+ old_data = skb->data;
__skb_pull(skb, len);
+ skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, old_data + off, len);
+ memmove(skb->data, old_data, off);
return 0;
}
