This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mptcp: use proper req destructor for IPv6
to the 6.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mptcp-use-proper-req-destructor-for-ipv6.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From d3295fee3c756ece33ac0d935e172e68c0a4161b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:28:10 -0800
Subject: mptcp: use proper req destructor for IPv6
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit d3295fee3c756ece33ac0d935e172e68c0a4161b upstream.
Before, only the destructor from TCP request sock in IPv4 was called
even if the subflow was IPv6.
It is important to use the right destructor to avoid memory leaks with
some advanced IPv6 features, e.g. when the request socks contain
specific IPv6 options.
Fixes: 79c0949e9a09 ("mptcp: Add key generation and token tree")
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ static void subflow_req_destructor(struc
sock_put((struct sock *)subflow_req->msk);
mptcp_token_destroy_request(req);
- tcp_request_sock_ops.destructor(req);
}
static void subflow_generate_hmac(u64 key1, u64 key2, u32 nonce1, u32 nonce2,
@@ -550,6 +549,12 @@ drop:
return 0;
}
+static void subflow_v4_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req)
+{
+ subflow_req_destructor(req);
+ tcp_request_sock_ops.destructor(req);
+}
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
static struct request_sock_ops mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops __ro_after_init;
static struct tcp_request_sock_ops subflow_request_sock_ipv6_ops __ro_after_init;
@@ -581,6 +586,12 @@ drop:
tcp_listendrop(sk);
return 0; /* don't send reset */
}
+
+static void subflow_v6_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req)
+{
+ subflow_req_destructor(req);
+ tcp6_request_sock_ops.destructor(req);
+}
#endif
struct request_sock *mptcp_subflow_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
@@ -1929,8 +1940,6 @@ static int subflow_ops_init(struct reque
if (!subflow_ops->slab)
return -ENOMEM;
- subflow_ops->destructor = subflow_req_destructor;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1938,6 +1947,8 @@ void __init mptcp_subflow_init(void)
{
mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops = tcp_request_sock_ops;
mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops.slab_name = "request_sock_subflow_v4";
+ mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops.destructor = subflow_v4_req_destructor;
+
if (subflow_ops_init(&mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops) != 0)
panic("MPTCP: failed to init subflow v4 request sock ops\n");
@@ -1963,6 +1974,8 @@ void __init mptcp_subflow_init(void)
mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops = tcp6_request_sock_ops;
mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops.slab_name = "request_sock_subflow_v6";
+ mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops.destructor = subflow_v6_req_destructor;
+
if (subflow_ops_init(&mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops) != 0)
panic("MPTCP: failed to init subflow v6 request sock ops\n");
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.0/mptcp-use-proper-req-destructor-for-ipv6.patch
queue-6.0/mptcp-remove-mptcp-ifdef-in-tcp-syn-cookies.patch
queue-6.0/mptcp-netlink-fix-some-error-return-code.patch
queue-6.0/mptcp-dedicated-request-sock-for-subflow-in-v6.patch
