This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled mrp: introduce active flags to prevent UAF when applicant uninit to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: mrp-introduce-active-flags-to-prevent-uaf-when-appli.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 47e778106d41cccf99db3039f9f06f0c528af541 Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Nov 16 19:45:11 2022 +0800 mrp: introduce active flags to prevent UAF when applicant uninit [ Upstream commit ab0377803dafc58f1e22296708c1c28e309414d6 ] The caller of del_timer_sync must prevent restarting of the timer, If we have no this synchronization, there is a small probability that the cancellation will not be successful. And syzbot report the fellowing crash: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hlist_add_head include/linux/list.h:929 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in enqueue_timer+0x18/0xa4 kernel/time/timer.c:605 Write at addr f9ff000024df6058 by task syz-fuzzer/2256 Pointer tag: [f9], memory tag: [fe] CPU: 1 PID: 2256 Comm: syz-fuzzer Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-syzkaller-00008- ge01d50cbd6ee #0 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0xe0/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156 dump_backtrace arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:162 [inline] show_stack+0x18/0x40 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:284 [inline] print_report+0x1a8/0x4a0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report+0x94/0xb4 mm/kasan/report.c:495 __do_kernel_fault+0x164/0x1e0 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:320 do_bad_area arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:473 [inline] do_tag_check_fault+0x78/0x8c arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:749 do_mem_abort+0x44/0x94 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:825 el1_abort+0x40/0x60 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:367 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xd8/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:427 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:576 hlist_add_head include/linux/list.h:929 [inline] enqueue_timer+0x18/0xa4 kernel/time/timer.c:605 mod_timer+0x14/0x20 kernel/time/timer.c:1161 mrp_periodic_timer_arm net/802/mrp.c:614 [inline] mrp_periodic_timer+0xa0/0xc0 net/802/mrp.c:627 call_timer_fn.constprop.0+0x24/0x80 kernel/time/timer.c:1474 expire_timers+0x98/0xc4 kernel/time/timer.c:1519 To fix it, we can introduce a new active flags to make sure the timer will not restart. Reported-by: syzbot+6fd64001c20aa99e34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/include/net/mrp.h b/include/net/mrp.h index 1c308c034e1a..a8102661fd61 100644 --- a/include/net/mrp.h +++ b/include/net/mrp.h @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct mrp_applicant { struct sk_buff *pdu; struct rb_root mad; struct rcu_head rcu; + bool active; }; struct mrp_port { diff --git a/net/802/mrp.c b/net/802/mrp.c index 35e04cc5390c..c10a432a5b43 100644 --- a/net/802/mrp.c +++ b/net/802/mrp.c @@ -606,7 +606,10 @@ static void mrp_join_timer(struct timer_list *t) spin_unlock(&app->lock); mrp_queue_xmit(app); - mrp_join_timer_arm(app); + spin_lock(&app->lock); + if (likely(app->active)) + mrp_join_timer_arm(app); + spin_unlock(&app->lock); } static void mrp_periodic_timer_arm(struct mrp_applicant *app) @@ -620,11 +623,12 @@ static void mrp_periodic_timer(struct timer_list *t) struct mrp_applicant *app = from_timer(app, t, periodic_timer); spin_lock(&app->lock); - mrp_mad_event(app, MRP_EVENT_PERIODIC); - mrp_pdu_queue(app); + if (likely(app->active)) { + mrp_mad_event(app, MRP_EVENT_PERIODIC); + mrp_pdu_queue(app); + mrp_periodic_timer_arm(app); + } spin_unlock(&app->lock); - - mrp_periodic_timer_arm(app); } static int mrp_pdu_parse_end_mark(struct sk_buff *skb, int *offset) @@ -872,6 +876,7 @@ int mrp_init_applicant(struct net_device *dev, struct mrp_application *appl) app->dev = dev; app->app = appl; app->mad = RB_ROOT; + app->active = true; spin_lock_init(&app->lock); skb_queue_head_init(&app->queue); rcu_assign_pointer(dev->mrp_port->applicants[appl->type], app); @@ -900,6 +905,9 @@ void mrp_uninit_applicant(struct net_device *dev, struct mrp_application *appl) RCU_INIT_POINTER(port->applicants[appl->type], NULL); + spin_lock_bh(&app->lock); + app->active = false; + spin_unlock_bh(&app->lock); /* Delete timer and generate a final TX event to flush out * all pending messages before the applicant is gone. */