This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
md/raid0, raid10: Don't set discard sectors for request queue
to the 6.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
md-raid0-raid10-don-t-set-discard-sectors-for-reques.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 7a748e9bf290de755e34289e30d354c2611590cd
Author: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Nov 2 10:07:30 2022 +0800
md/raid0, raid10: Don't set discard sectors for request queue
[ Upstream commit 8e1a2279ca2b0485cc379a153d02a9793f74a48f ]
It should use disk_stack_limits to get a proper max_discard_sectors
rather than setting a value by stack drivers.
And there is a bug. If all member disks are rotational devices,
raid0/raid10 set max_discard_sectors. So the member devices are
not ssd/nvme, but raid0/raid10 export the wrong value. It reports
warning messages in function __blkdev_issue_discard when mkfs.xfs
like this:
[ 4616.022599] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4616.027779] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 99634 at block/blk-lib.c:50 __blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0
[ 4616.140663] RIP: 0010:__blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0
[ 4616.146601] Code: 24 4c 89 20 31 c0 e9 fe fe ff ff c1 e8 09 8d 48 ff 4c 89 f0 4c 09 e8 48 85 c1 0f 84 55 ff ff ff b8 ea ff ff ff e9 df fe ff ff <0f> 0b 48 8d 74 24 08 e8 ea d6 00 00 48 c7 c6 20 1e 89 ab 48 c7 c7
[ 4616.167567] RSP: 0018:ffffaab88cbffca8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 4616.173406] RAX: ffff9ba1f9e44678 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9ba1c9792080
[ 4616.181376] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9ba1c9792080
[ 4616.189345] RBP: 0000000000000cc0 R08: ffffaab88cbffd10 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 4616.197317] R10: 0000000000000012 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 4616.205288] R13: 0000000000400000 R14: 0000000000000cc0 R15: ffff9ba1c9792080
[ 4616.213259] FS: 00007f9a5534e980(0000) GS:ffff9ba1b7c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 4616.222298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 4616.228719] CR2: 000055a390a4c518 CR3: 0000000123e40006 CR4: 00000000001706e0
[ 4616.236689] Call Trace:
[ 4616.239428] blkdev_issue_discard+0x52/0xb0
[ 4616.244108] blkdev_common_ioctl+0x43c/0xa00
[ 4616.248883] blkdev_ioctl+0x116/0x280
[ 4616.252977] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0
[ 4616.257163] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
[ 4616.261164] ? handle_mm_fault+0xc5/0x2a0
[ 4616.265652] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1d8/0x690
[ 4616.270527] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90
[ 4616.274717] ? exc_page_fault+0x62/0x150
[ 4616.279097] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[ 4616.284748] RIP: 0033:0x7f9a55398c6b
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index 857c49399c28..b536befd8898 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -398,7 +398,6 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev)
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
- blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue, UINT_MAX);
blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 64d6e4cd8a3a..b19c6ce89d5e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4104,8 +4104,6 @@ static int raid10_run(struct mddev *mddev)
conf->thread = NULL;
if (mddev->queue) {
- blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue,
- UINT_MAX);
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(mddev->queue, 0);
blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
raid10_set_io_opt(conf);
