This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled rcu: Fix __this_cpu_read() lockdep warning in rcu_force_quiescent_state() to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: rcu-fix-__this_cpu_read-lockdep-warning-in-rcu_force.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit f213b8ae77799cbca9054f7ec026836de0030969 Author: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Oct 13 12:41:48 2022 +0800 rcu: Fix __this_cpu_read() lockdep warning in rcu_force_quiescent_state() [ Upstream commit ceb1c8c9b8aa9199da46a0f29d2d5f08d9b44c15 ] Running rcutorture with non-zero fqs_duration module parameter in a kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y results in the following splat: BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: rcu_torture_fqs/398 caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 CPU: 3 PID: 398 Comm: rcu_torture_fqs Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-yoctodev-standard+ Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x86 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 check_preemption_disabled+0xe5/0xf0 __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 rcu_force_quiescent_state.part.0+0x1c/0x170 rcu_force_quiescent_state+0x1e/0x30 rcu_torture_fqs+0xca/0x160 ? rcu_torture_boost+0x430/0x430 kthread+0x192/0x1d0 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x30/0x30 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> The problem is that rcu_force_quiescent_state() uses __this_cpu_read() in preemptible code instead of the proper raw_cpu_read(). This commit therefore changes __this_cpu_read() to raw_cpu_read(). Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 93416afebd59..14d9384fba05 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void) struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL; /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */ - rnp = __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.mynode); + rnp = raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.mynode); for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) { ret = (READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) || !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);