This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cifs: fix missing unlock in cifs_file_copychunk_range()
to the 6.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cifs-fix-missing-unlock-in-cifs_file_copychunk_range.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 502487847743018c93d75b401eac2ea4c4973123 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:51:59 +0800
Subject: cifs: fix missing unlock in cifs_file_copychunk_range()
From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 502487847743018c93d75b401eac2ea4c4973123 upstream.
xfstests generic/013 and generic/476 reported WARNING as follows:
WARNING: lock held when returning to user space!
6.1.0-rc5+ #4 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------
fsstress/504233 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
2 locks held by fsstress/504233:
#0: ffff888054c38850 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#21){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
lock_two_nondirectories+0xcf/0xf0
#1: ffff8880b8fec750 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#21/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
lock_two_nondirectories+0xb7/0xf0
This will lead to deadlock and hungtask.
Fix this by releasing locks when failed to write out on a file range in
cifs_file_copychunk_range().
Fixes: 3e3761f1ec7d ("smb3: use filemap_write_and_wait_range instead of filemap_write_and_wait")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.0
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ ssize_t cifs_file_copychunk_range(unsign
rc = filemap_write_and_wait_range(src_inode->i_mapping, off,
off + len - 1);
if (rc)
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
/* should we flush first and last page first */
truncate_inode_pages(&target_inode->i_data, 0);
@@ -1268,6 +1268,8 @@ ssize_t cifs_file_copychunk_range(unsign
* that target is updated on the server
*/
CIFS_I(target_inode)->time = 0;
+
+unlock:
/* although unlocking in the reverse order from locking is not
* strictly necessary here it is a little cleaner to be consistent
*/
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chenxiaosong2@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.0/cifs-fix-missing-unlock-in-cifs_file_copychunk_range.patch
