Patch "gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock

to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     gfs2-check-sb_bsize_shift-after-reading-superblock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 670f8ce56dd0632dc29a0322e188cc73ce3c6b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Price <anprice@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:22:00 +0100
Subject: gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock

From: Andrew Price <anprice@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 670f8ce56dd0632dc29a0322e188cc73ce3c6b92 upstream.

Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it's the expected value.

Tested with:

    mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
    for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
        gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
        mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test && umount /mnt/test
    done

Before this patch we get a withdraw after

[   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492

and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like

[   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.

Reported-by: syzbot+dcf33a7aae997956fe06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
@@ -180,7 +180,10 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd
 		pr_warn("Invalid block size\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-
+	if (sb->sb_bsize_shift != ffs(sb->sb_bsize) - 1) {
+		pr_warn("Invalid block size shift\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from anprice@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.15/gfs2-check-sb_bsize_shift-after-reading-superblock.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux