Patch "ARM: 9233/1: stacktrace: Skip frame pointer boundary check for call_with_stack()" has been added to the 6.0-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: 9233/1: stacktrace: Skip frame pointer boundary check for call_with_stack()

to the 6.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-9233-1-stacktrace-skip-frame-pointer-boundary-ch.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 76287c94137a118cb4747192019a75991a2a3ec0
Author: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Aug 26 09:06:22 2022 +0100

    ARM: 9233/1: stacktrace: Skip frame pointer boundary check for call_with_stack()
    
    [ Upstream commit 5854e4d8530e6ed4c2532a71a6b0474e199d44dd ]
    
    When using the frame pointer unwinder, it was found that the stack trace
    output of stack_trace_save() is incomplete if the stack contains
    call_with_stack():
    
     [0x7f00002c] dump_stack_task+0x2c/0x90 [hrtimer]
     [0x7f0000a0] hrtimer_hander+0x10/0x18 [hrtimer]
     [0x801a67f0] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b0/0x3b4
     [0x801a7350] hrtimer_run_queues+0xc4/0xd8
     [0x801a597c] update_process_times+0x3c/0x88
     [0x801b5a98] tick_periodic+0x50/0xd8
     [0x801b5bf4] tick_handle_periodic+0x24/0x84
     [0x8010ffc4] twd_handler+0x38/0x48
     [0x8017d220] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa8/0x244
     [0x80176e9c] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c
     [0x8052e3a8] gic_handle_irq+0x7c/0x90
     [0x808ab15c] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x60/0x80
     [0x8051191c] call_with_stack+0x1c/0x20
    
    For the frame pointer unwinder, unwind_frame() checks stackframe::fp by
    stackframe::sp. Since call_with_stack() switches the SP from one stack
    to another, stackframe::fp and stackframe: :sp will point to different
    stacks, so we can no longer check stackframe::fp by stackframe::sp. Skip
    checking stackframe::fp at this point to avoid this problem.
    
    Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Linus Waleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index d0fa2037460a..af87040b0353 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
 #include <asm/traps.h>
 
+#include "reboot.h"
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
 /*
  * Unwind the current stack frame and store the new register values in the
@@ -39,29 +41,53 @@
  * Note that with framepointer enabled, even the leaf functions have the same
  * prologue and epilogue, therefore we can ignore the LR value in this case.
  */
-int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
+
+extern unsigned long call_with_stack_end;
+
+static int frame_pointer_check(struct stackframe *frame)
 {
 	unsigned long high, low;
 	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+	unsigned long pc = frame->pc;
+
+	/*
+	 * call_with_stack() is the only place we allow SP to jump from one
+	 * stack to another, with FP and SP pointing to different stacks,
+	 * skipping the FP boundary check at this point.
+	 */
+	if (pc >= (unsigned long)&call_with_stack &&
+			pc < (unsigned long)&call_with_stack_end)
+		return 0;
 
 	/* only go to a higher address on the stack */
 	low = frame->sp;
 	high = ALIGN(low, THREAD_SIZE);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
 	/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
 	if (fp < low + 4 || fp > high - 4)
 		return -EINVAL;
-
-	frame->sp = frame->fp;
-	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
 #else
-	/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
 	if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
 		return -EINVAL;
+#endif
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
+{
+	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+
+	if (frame_pointer_check(frame))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* restore the registers from the stack frame */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+	frame->sp = frame->fp;
+	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
+#else
 	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 12));
 	frame->sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 8));
 	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 4));
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S b/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
index 0a268a6c513c..5030d4e8d126 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
@@ -46,4 +46,6 @@ UNWIND( .setfp	fpreg, sp	)
 	pop	{fpreg, pc}
 UNWIND( .fnend			)
 #endif
+	.globl call_with_stack_end
+call_with_stack_end:
 ENDPROC(call_with_stack)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux