This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()
to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fsdax-fix-infinite-loop-in-dax_iomap_rw.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit b8bb9bc0cdd9c91ab1f82f76b1c89c15702873c6
Author: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jul 25 11:20:50 2022 +0800
fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()
[ Upstream commit 17d9c15c9b9e7fb285f7ac5367dfb5f00ff575e3 ]
I got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command
in virtiofs.
WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620
? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80
fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0
new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180
? 0xffffffff81000000
vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0
ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0
__x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case,
iomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing
the infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().
Fixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().
Fixes: ca289e0b95af ("fsdax: switch dax_iomap_rw to use iomap_iter")
Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220725032050.3873372-1-lijinlin3@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 4155a6107fa1..7ab248ed21aa 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -1241,6 +1241,9 @@ dax_iomap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
loff_t done = 0;
int ret;
+ if (!iomi.len)
+ return 0;
+
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
lockdep_assert_held_write(&iomi.inode->i_rwsem);
iomi.flags |= IOMAP_WRITE;
