Patch "xfs: always succeed at setting the reserve pool size" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xfs: always succeed at setting the reserve pool size

to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xfs-always-succeed-at-setting-the-reserve-pool-size.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From foo@baz Tue Aug 23 09:20:27 AM CEST 2022
From: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:14:27 -0700
Subject: xfs: always succeed at setting the reserve pool size
To: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20220819181431.4113819-6-leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx>

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 0baa2657dc4d79202148be79a3dc36c35f425060 ]

Nowadays, xfs_mod_fdblocks will always choose to fill the reserve pool
with freed blocks before adding to fdblocks.  Therefore, we can change
the behavior of xfs_reserve_blocks slightly -- setting the target size
of the pool should always succeed, since a deficiency will eventually
be made up as blocks get freed.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
@@ -434,11 +434,14 @@ xfs_reserve_blocks(
 	 * The code below estimates how many blocks it can request from
 	 * fdblocks to stash in the reserve pool.  This is a classic TOCTOU
 	 * race since fdblocks updates are not always coordinated via
-	 * m_sb_lock.
+	 * m_sb_lock.  Set the reserve size even if there's not enough free
+	 * space to fill it because mod_fdblocks will refill an undersized
+	 * reserve when it can.
 	 */
 	free = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks) -
 						xfs_fdblocks_unavailable(mp);
 	delta = request - mp->m_resblks;
+	mp->m_resblks = request;
 	if (delta > 0 && free > 0) {
 		/*
 		 * We'll either succeed in getting space from the free block
@@ -455,10 +458,8 @@ xfs_reserve_blocks(
 		 * Update the reserve counters if blocks have been successfully
 		 * allocated.
 		 */
-		if (!error) {
-			mp->m_resblks += fdblks_delta;
+		if (!error)
 			mp->m_resblks_avail += fdblks_delta;
-		}
 	}
 out:
 	if (outval) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.15/xfs-remove-infinite-loop-when-reserving-free-block-pool.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-reserve-quota-for-target-dir-expansion-when-renaming-files.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-fix-soft-lockup-via-spinning-in-filestream-ag-selection-loop.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-flush-inodegc-workqueue-tasks-before-cancel.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-revert-xfs-actually-bump-warning-counts-when-we-send-warnings.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-reserve-quota-for-dir-expansion-when-linking-unlinking-files.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-fix-overfilling-of-reserve-pool.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-reject-crazy-array-sizes-being-fed-to-xfs_ioc_getbmap.patch
queue-5.15/xfs-always-succeed-at-setting-the-reserve-pool-size.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux