This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled BPF: Fix potential bad pointer dereference in bpf_sys_bpf() to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: bpf-fix-potential-bad-pointer-dereference-in-bpf_sys_bpf.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From e2dcac2f58f5a95ab092d1da237ffdc0da1832cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jinghao Jia <jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:17:13 +0000 Subject: BPF: Fix potential bad pointer dereference in bpf_sys_bpf() From: Jinghao Jia <jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit e2dcac2f58f5a95ab092d1da237ffdc0da1832cf upstream. The bpf_sys_bpf() helper function allows an eBPF program to load another eBPF program from within the kernel. In this case the argument union bpf_attr pointer (as well as the insns and license pointers inside) is a kernel address instead of a userspace address (which is the case of a usual bpf() syscall). To make the memory copying process in the syscall work in both cases, bpfptr_t was introduced to wrap around the pointer and distinguish its origin. Specifically, when copying memory contents from a bpfptr_t, a copy_from_user() is performed in case of a userspace address and a memcpy() is performed for a kernel address. This can lead to problems because the in-kernel pointer is never checked for validity. The problem happens when an eBPF syscall program tries to call bpf_sys_bpf() to load a program but provides a bad insns pointer -- say 0xdeadbeef -- in the bpf_attr union. The helper calls __sys_bpf() which would then call bpf_prog_load() to load the program. bpf_prog_load() is responsible for copying the eBPF instructions to the newly allocated memory for the program; it creates a kernel bpfptr_t for insns and invokes copy_from_bpfptr(). Internally, all bpfptr_t operations are backed by the corresponding sockptr_t operations, which performs direct memcpy() on kernel pointers for copy_from/strncpy_from operations. Therefore, the code is always happy to dereference the bad pointer to trigger a un-handle-able page fault and in turn an oops. However, this is not supposed to happen because at that point the eBPF program is already verified and should not cause a memory error. Sample KASAN trace: [ 25.685056][ T228] ================================================================== [ 25.685680][ T228] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.686210][ T228] Read of size 80 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task poc/228 [ 25.686732][ T228] [ 25.686893][ T228] CPU: 3 PID: 228 Comm: poc Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7 #7 [ 25.687375][ T228] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS d55cb5a 04/01/2014 [ 25.687991][ T228] Call Trace: [ 25.688223][ T228] <TASK> [ 25.688429][ T228] dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9e [ 25.688747][ T228] print_report+0xea/0x200 [ 25.689061][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.689401][ T228] ? _printk+0x54/0x6e [ 25.689693][ T228] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xd0 [ 25.690071][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.690412][ T228] kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0 [ 25.690716][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.691059][ T228] kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0 [ 25.691405][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.691734][ T228] memcpy+0x25/0x60 [ 25.692000][ T228] copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30 [ 25.692328][ T228] bpf_prog_load+0x604/0x9e0 [ 25.692653][ T228] ? cap_capable+0xb4/0xe0 [ 25.692956][ T228] ? security_capable+0x4f/0x70 [ 25.693324][ T228] __sys_bpf+0x3af/0x580 [ 25.693635][ T228] bpf_sys_bpf+0x45/0x240 [ 25.693937][ T228] bpf_prog_f0ec79a5a3caca46_bpf_func1+0xa2/0xbd [ 25.694394][ T228] bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x2f/0xb0 [ 25.694756][ T228] bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x146/0x1c0 [ 25.695144][ T228] bpf_prog_test_run+0x172/0x190 [ 25.695487][ T228] __sys_bpf+0x2c5/0x580 [ 25.695776][ T228] __x64_sys_bpf+0x3a/0x50 [ 25.696084][ T228] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 [ 25.696393][ T228] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x50/0x60 [ 25.696815][ T228] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x36/0xa0 [ 25.697202][ T228] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40 [ 25.697586][ T228] ? do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x90 [ 25.697899][ T228] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 25.698312][ T228] RIP: 0033:0x7f6d543fb759 [ 25.698624][ T228] Code: 08 5b 89 e8 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 97 a6 0e 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 25.699946][ T228] RSP: 002b:00007ffc3df78468 EFLAGS: 00000287 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 25.700526][ T228] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc3df78628 RCX: 00007f6d543fb759 [ 25.701071][ T228] RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 00007ffc3df78478 RDI: 000000000000000a [ 25.701636][ T228] RBP: 00007ffc3df78510 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000300000 [ 25.702191][ T228] R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000287 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 25.702736][ T228] R13: 00007ffc3df78638 R14: 000055a1584aca68 R15: 00007f6d5456a000 [ 25.703282][ T228] </TASK> [ 25.703490][ T228] ================================================================== [ 25.704050][ T228] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint Update copy_from_bpfptr() and strncpy_from_bpfptr() so that: - for a kernel pointer, it uses the safe copy_from_kernel_nofault() and strncpy_from_kernel_nofault() functions. - for a userspace pointer, it performs copy_from_user() and strncpy_from_user(). Fixes: af2ac3e13e45 ("bpf: Prepare bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space.") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727132905.45166-1-jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220729201713.88688-1-jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/bpfptr.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/bpfptr.h +++ b/include/linux/bpfptr.h @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ static inline void bpfptr_add(bpfptr_t * static inline int copy_from_bpfptr_offset(void *dst, bpfptr_t src, size_t offset, size_t size) { - return copy_from_sockptr_offset(dst, (sockptr_t) src, offset, size); + if (!bpfptr_is_kernel(src)) + return copy_from_user(dst, src.user + offset, size); + return copy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, src.kernel + offset, size); } static inline int copy_from_bpfptr(void *dst, bpfptr_t src, size_t size) @@ -78,7 +80,9 @@ static inline void *kvmemdup_bpfptr(bpfp static inline long strncpy_from_bpfptr(char *dst, bpfptr_t src, size_t count) { - return strncpy_from_sockptr(dst, (sockptr_t) src, count); + if (bpfptr_is_kernel(src)) + return strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, src.kernel, count); + return strncpy_from_user(dst, src.user, count); } #endif /* _LINUX_BPFPTR_H */ Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jinghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-5.19/bpf-fix-potential-bad-pointer-dereference-in-bpf_sys_bpf.patch