Patch "dm raid: fix address sanitizer warning in raid_status" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    dm raid: fix address sanitizer warning in raid_status

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     dm-raid-fix-address-sanitizer-warning-in-raid_status.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 1fbeea217d8f297fe0e0956a1516d14ba97d0396 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 14:31:35 -0400
Subject: dm raid: fix address sanitizer warning in raid_status

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 1fbeea217d8f297fe0e0956a1516d14ba97d0396 upstream.

There is this warning when using a kernel with the address sanitizer
and running this testsuite:
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/tree/main/storage/swraid/scsi_raid

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in raid_status+0x1747/0x2820 [dm_raid]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888079d2c7e8 by task lvcreate/13319
CPU: 0 PID: 13319 Comm: lvcreate Not tainted 5.18.0-0.rc3.<snip> #1
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x9c
 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1e0
 print_report.cold+0x55/0x244
 kasan_report+0xc9/0x100
 raid_status+0x1747/0x2820 [dm_raid]
 dm_ima_measure_on_table_load+0x4b8/0xca0 [dm_mod]
 table_load+0x35c/0x630 [dm_mod]
 ctl_ioctl+0x411/0x630 [dm_mod]
 dm_ctl_ioctl+0xa/0x10 [dm_mod]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x12a/0x1a0
 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80

The warning is caused by reading conf->max_nr_stripes in raid_status. The
code in raid_status reads mddev->private, casts it to struct r5conf and
reads the entry max_nr_stripes.

However, if we have different raid type than 4/5/6, mddev->private
doesn't point to struct r5conf; it may point to struct r0conf, struct
r1conf, struct r10conf or struct mpconf. If we cast a pointer to one
of these structs to struct r5conf, we will be reading invalid memory
and KASAN warns about it.

Fix this bug by reading struct r5conf only if raid type is 4, 5 or 6.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/dm-raid.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -3394,7 +3394,7 @@ static void raid_status(struct dm_target
 {
 	struct raid_set *rs = ti->private;
 	struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
-	struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
+	struct r5conf *conf = rs_is_raid456(rs) ? mddev->private : NULL;
 	int i, max_nr_stripes = conf ? conf->max_nr_stripes : 0;
 	bool array_in_sync;
 	unsigned int raid_param_cnt = 1; /* at least 1 for chunksize */


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-4.14/md-raid10-fix-kasan-warning.patch
queue-4.14/dm-raid-fix-address-sanitizer-warning-in-raid_status.patch
queue-4.14/dm-raid-fix-address-sanitizer-warning-in-raid_resume.patch
queue-4.14/add-barriers-to-buffer_uptodate-and-set_buffer_uptodate.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux