Patch "kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests" has been added to the 5.19-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests

to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     kunit-executor-fix-a-memory-leak-on-failure-in-kunit.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit e2965aec3c3178a65bf1df74054396c2ff6e705c
Author: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jul 13 07:25:27 2022 +0800

    kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests
    
    [ Upstream commit 94681e289bf5d10c9db9db143d1a22d8717205c5 ]
    
    It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the
    copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked.
    
    Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered'
    failing.
    
    Note that there may also have been a similar issue in
    kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten
    kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites".
    
    This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here:
    https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@xxxxxxxxx/
    
    And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot:
    https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
    
    Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
    Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 96f96e42ce06..16fb88c0aca3 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -76,8 +76,10 @@ kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob)
 	memcpy(copy, suite, sizeof(*copy));
 
 	filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!filtered)
+	if (!filtered) {
+		kfree(copy);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
 
 	n = 0;
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux