This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nf_tables: do not allow RULE_ID to refer to another chain
to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nf_tables-do-not-allow-rule_id-to-refer-to-another-chain.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 36d5b2913219ac853908b0f1c664345e04313856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:01:48 -0300
Subject: netfilter: nf_tables: do not allow RULE_ID to refer to another chain
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 36d5b2913219ac853908b0f1c664345e04313856 upstream.
When doing lookups for rules on the same batch by using its ID, a rule from
a different chain can be used. If a rule is added to a chain but tries to
be positioned next to a rule from a different chain, it will be linked to
chain2, but the use counter on chain1 would be the one to be incremented.
When looking for rules by ID, use the chain that was used for the lookup by
name. The chain used in the context copied to the transaction needs to
match that same chain. That way, struct nft_rule does not need to get
enlarged with another member.
Fixes: 1a94e38d254b ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFTA_RULE_ID attribute")
Fixes: 75dd48e2e420 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Support RULE_ID reference in new rule")
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3373,6 +3373,7 @@ static int nft_table_validate(struct net
}
static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
+ const struct nft_chain *chain,
const struct nlattr *nla);
#define NFT_RULE_MAXEXPRS 128
@@ -3461,7 +3462,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_b
return PTR_ERR(old_rule);
}
} else if (nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION_ID]) {
- old_rule = nft_rule_lookup_byid(net, nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION_ID]);
+ old_rule = nft_rule_lookup_byid(net, chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION_ID]);
if (IS_ERR(old_rule)) {
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION_ID]);
return PTR_ERR(old_rule);
@@ -3606,6 +3607,7 @@ err_release_expr:
}
static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
+ const struct nft_chain *chain,
const struct nlattr *nla)
{
struct nftables_pernet *nft_net = nft_pernet(net);
@@ -3616,6 +3618,7 @@ static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup_
struct nft_rule *rule = nft_trans_rule(trans);
if (trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWRULE &&
+ trans->ctx.chain == chain &&
id == nft_trans_rule_id(trans))
return rule;
}
@@ -3665,7 +3668,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_b
err = nft_delrule(&ctx, rule);
} else if (nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]) {
- rule = nft_rule_lookup_byid(net, nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]);
+ rule = nft_rule_lookup_byid(net, chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]);
if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]);
return PTR_ERR(rule);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-5.19/netfilter-nf_tables-do-not-allow-chain_id-to-refer-to-another-table.patch
queue-5.19/netfilter-nf_tables-do-not-allow-set_id-to-refer-to-another-table.patch
queue-5.19/netfilter-nf_tables-do-not-allow-rule_id-to-refer-to-another-chain.patch
