This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test
to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
selftests-bpf-fix-dubious-pointer-arithmetic-test.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Sat Aug 13 03:11:42 PM CEST 2022
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 10:39:47 +0300
Subject: selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test
To: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20220809073947.33804-5-ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 3615bdf6d9b19db12b1589861609b4f1c6a8d303 upstream.
The verifier trace changed following a bugfix. After checking the 64-bit
sign, only the upper bit mask is known, not bit 31. Update the test
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
[OP: adjust for 4.19 selftests]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
@@ -475,10 +475,10 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
*/
{7, "R5=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775806,smax_value=9223372036854775806,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"},
/* Checked s>=0 */
- {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"},
+ {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"},
/* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */
- {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"},
- {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"},
+ {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"},
+ {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"},
/* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine.
* We checked the bounds, but it might have been able
* to overflow if the packet pointer started in the
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
* So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access
* attempt will fail.
*/
- {15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"},
+ {15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"},
}
},
{
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.19/bpf-verifer-adjust_scalar_min_max_vals-to-always-call-update_reg_bounds.patch
queue-4.19/selftests-bpf-fix-dubious-pointer-arithmetic-test.patch
queue-4.19/selftests-bpf-fix-test_align-verifier-log-patterns.patch
