This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled net/mlx5e: CT: Use own workqueue instead of mlx5e priv to the 5.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: net-mlx5e-ct-use-own-workqueue-instead-of-mlx5e-priv.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit da6eb243b37c7531d91de7a8b42f12dfae299c1b Author: Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Jun 21 10:43:55 2022 +0300 net/mlx5e: CT: Use own workqueue instead of mlx5e priv [ Upstream commit 6c4e8fa03fde7e5b304594294e397a9ba92feaf6 ] Allocate a ct priv workqueue instead of using mlx5e priv one so flushing will only be of related CT entries. Also move flushing of the workqueue before rhashtable destroy otherwise entries won't be valid. Fixes: b069e14fff46 ("net/mlx5e: CT: Fix queued up restore put() executing after relevant ft release") Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c index 1ff7a07bcd06..fbcce63e5b80 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv { struct mlx5_ct_fs *fs; struct mlx5_ct_fs_ops *fs_ops; spinlock_t ht_lock; /* protects ft entries */ + struct workqueue_struct *wq; }; struct mlx5_ct_flow { @@ -927,14 +928,11 @@ static void mlx5_tc_ct_entry_del_work(struct work_struct *work) static void __mlx5_tc_ct_entry_put(struct mlx5_ct_entry *entry) { - struct mlx5e_priv *priv; - if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&entry->refcnt)) return; - priv = netdev_priv(entry->ct_priv->netdev); INIT_WORK(&entry->work, mlx5_tc_ct_entry_del_work); - queue_work(priv->wq, &entry->work); + queue_work(entry->ct_priv->wq, &entry->work); } static struct mlx5_ct_counter * @@ -1744,19 +1742,16 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_flush_ft_entry(void *ptr, void *arg) static void mlx5_tc_ct_del_ft_cb(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *ct_priv, struct mlx5_ct_ft *ft) { - struct mlx5e_priv *priv; - if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&ft->refcount)) return; + flush_workqueue(ct_priv->wq); nf_flow_table_offload_del_cb(ft->nf_ft, mlx5_tc_ct_block_flow_offload, ft); rhashtable_remove_fast(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &ft->node, zone_params); rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&ft->ct_entries_ht, mlx5_tc_ct_flush_ft_entry, ct_priv); - priv = netdev_priv(ct_priv->netdev); - flush_workqueue(priv->wq); mlx5_tc_ct_free_pre_ct_tables(ft); mapping_remove(ct_priv->zone_mapping, ft->zone_restore_id); kfree(ft); @@ -2139,6 +2134,12 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_fs_chains *chains, if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params)) goto err_ct_tuples_nat_ht; + ct_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("mlx5e_ct_priv_wq", 0); + if (!ct_priv->wq) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto err_wq; + } + err = mlx5_tc_ct_fs_init(ct_priv); if (err) goto err_init_fs; @@ -2146,6 +2147,8 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_fs_chains *chains, return ct_priv; err_init_fs: + destroy_workqueue(ct_priv->wq); +err_wq: rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht); err_ct_tuples_nat_ht: rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht); @@ -2175,6 +2178,7 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_clean(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *ct_priv) if (!ct_priv) return; + destroy_workqueue(ct_priv->wq); chains = ct_priv->chains; ct_priv->fs_ops->destroy(ct_priv->fs);