This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled stddef: Introduce DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: stddef-introduce-declare_flex_array-helper.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit f387f204fd79d9ddb2e48d62eb9aa8d94da222e6 Author: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Aug 9 11:21:23 2021 -0700 stddef: Introduce DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper [ Upstream commit 3080ea5553cc909b000d1f1d964a9041962f2c5b ] There are many places where kernel code wants to have several different typed trailing flexible arrays. This would normally be done with multiple flexible arrays in a union, but since GCC and Clang don't (on the surface) allow this, there have been many open-coded workarounds, usually involving neighboring 0-element arrays at the end of a structure. For example, instead of something like this: struct thing { ... union { struct type1 foo[]; struct type2 bar[]; }; }; code works around the compiler with: struct thing { ... struct type1 foo[0]; struct type2 bar[]; }; Another case is when a flexible array is wanted as the single member within a struct (which itself is usually in a union). For example, this would be worked around as: union many { ... struct { struct type3 baz[0]; }; }; These kinds of work-arounds cause problems with size checks against such zero-element arrays (for example when building with -Warray-bounds and -Wzero-length-bounds, and with the coming FORTIFY_SOURCE improvements), so they must all be converted to "real" flexible arrays, avoiding warnings like this: fs/hpfs/anode.c: In function 'hpfs_add_sector_to_btree': fs/hpfs/anode.c:209:27: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct bplus_internal_node[0]' [-Wzero-length-bounds] 209 | anode->btree.u.internal[0].down = cpu_to_le32(a); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ In file included from fs/hpfs/hpfs_fn.h:26, from fs/hpfs/anode.c:10: fs/hpfs/hpfs.h:412:32: note: while referencing 'internal' 412 | struct bplus_internal_node internal[0]; /* (internal) 2-word entries giving | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c: In function 'es58x_fd_tx_can_msg': drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:360:35: warning: array subscript 65535 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds] 360 | tx_can_msg = (typeof(tx_can_msg))&es58x_fd_urb_cmd->raw_msg[msg_len]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_core.h:22, from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:17: drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.h:231:6: note: while referencing 'raw_msg' 231 | u8 raw_msg[0]; | ^~~~~~~ However, it _is_ entirely possible to have one or more flexible arrays in a struct or union: it just has to be in another struct. And since it cannot be alone in a struct, such a struct must have at least 1 other named member -- but that member can be zero sized. Wrap all this nonsense into the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() in support of having flexible arrays in unions (or alone in a struct). As with struct_group(), since this is needed in UAPI headers as well, implement the core there, with a non-UAPI wrapper. Additionally update kernel-doc to understand its existence. https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/137 Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h index 938216f8ab7e..31fdbb784c24 100644 --- a/include/linux/stddef.h +++ b/include/linux/stddef.h @@ -84,4 +84,17 @@ enum { #define struct_group_tagged(TAG, NAME, MEMBERS...) \ __struct_group(TAG, NAME, /* no attrs */, MEMBERS) +/** + * DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() - Declare a flexible array usable in a union + * + * @TYPE: The type of each flexible array element + * @NAME: The name of the flexible array member + * + * In order to have a flexible array member in a union or alone in a + * struct, it needs to be wrapped in an anonymous struct with at least 1 + * named member, but that member can be empty. + */ +#define DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) \ + __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) + #endif diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h b/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h index 610204f7c275..3021ea25a284 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h @@ -25,3 +25,19 @@ struct { MEMBERS } ATTRS; \ struct TAG { MEMBERS } ATTRS NAME; \ } + +/** + * __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() - Declare a flexible array usable in a union + * + * @TYPE: The type of each flexible array element + * @NAME: The name of the flexible array member + * + * In order to have a flexible array member in a union or alone in a + * struct, it needs to be wrapped in an anonymous struct with at least 1 + * named member, but that member can be empty. + */ +#define __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) \ + struct { \ + struct { } __empty_ ## NAME; \ + TYPE NAME[]; \ + } diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc index 38aa799a776c..5d54b57ff90c 100755 --- a/scripts/kernel-doc +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc @@ -1263,6 +1263,8 @@ sub dump_struct($$) { $members =~ s/DECLARE_KFIFO\s*\($args,\s*$args,\s*$args\)/$2 \*$1/gos; # replace DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR $members =~ s/DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR\s*\($args,\s*$args\)/$2 \*$1/gos; + # replace DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY + $members =~ s/(?:__)?DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY\s*\($args,\s*$args\)/$1 $2\[\]/gos; my $declaration = $members; # Split nested struct/union elements as newer ones