Patch "jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_fill_super" has been added to the 5.18-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_fill_super

to the 5.18-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     jffs2-fix-memory-leak-in-jffs2_do_fill_super.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.18 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 1b8118e73a01a2f0ce866749d8483c5d1f4b8b84
Author: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Apr 12 17:38:16 2022 +0800

    jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_fill_super
    
    [ Upstream commit c14adb1cf70a984ed081c67e9d27bc3caad9537c ]
    
    If jffs2_iget() or d_make_root() in jffs2_do_fill_super() returns
    an error, we can observe the following kmemleak report:
    
    --------------------------------------------
    unreferenced object 0xffff888105a65340 (size 64):
      comm "mount", pid 710, jiffies 4302851558 (age 58.239s)
      hex dump (first 32 bytes):
        00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
        00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
      backtrace:
        [<ffffffff859c45e5>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x475/0x8a0
        [<ffffffff86160146>] jffs2_sum_init+0x96/0x1a0
        [<ffffffff86140e25>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x745/0x2120
        [<ffffffff86149fec>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x35c/0x810
        [<ffffffff8614aae9>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2b9/0x3b0
        [...]
    unreferenced object 0xffff8881bd7f0000 (size 65536):
      comm "mount", pid 710, jiffies 4302851558 (age 58.239s)
      hex dump (first 32 bytes):
        bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb  ................
        bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb  ................
      backtrace:
        [<ffffffff858579ba>] kmalloc_order+0xda/0x110
        [<ffffffff85857a11>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x21/0x130
        [<ffffffff859c2ed1>] __kmalloc+0x711/0x8a0
        [<ffffffff86160189>] jffs2_sum_init+0xd9/0x1a0
        [<ffffffff86140e25>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x745/0x2120
        [<ffffffff86149fec>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x35c/0x810
        [<ffffffff8614aae9>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2b9/0x3b0
        [...]
    --------------------------------------------
    
    This is because the resources allocated in jffs2_sum_init() are not
    released. Call jffs2_sum_exit() to release these resources to solve
    the problem.
    
    Fixes: e631ddba5887 ("[JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)")
    Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/fs.c b/fs/jffs2/fs.c
index 71f03a5d36ed..f83a468b6488 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/fs.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/fs.c
@@ -604,6 +604,7 @@ int jffs2_do_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
 	jffs2_free_raw_node_refs(c);
 	kvfree(c->blocks);
 	jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem(c);
+	jffs2_sum_exit(c);
  out_inohash:
 	kfree(c->inocache_list);
  out_wbuf:



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux