Patch "bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bfq-drop-pointless-unlock-lock-pair.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Jun  6 08:05:28 PM CEST 2022
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon,  6 Jun 2022 19:56:37 +0200
Subject: bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair
To: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20220606175655.8993-2-jack@xxxxxxx>

From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

commit fc84e1f941b91221092da5b3102ec82da24c5673 upstream.

In bfq_insert_request() we unlock bfqd->lock only to call
trace_block_rq_insert() and then lock bfqd->lock again. This is really
pointless since tracing is disabled if we really care about performance
and even if the tracepoint is enabled, it is a quick call.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-5-jack@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |    3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5537,11 +5537,8 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct bl
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
-
 	blk_mq_sched_request_inserted(rq);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 	bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq);
 	if (!bfqq || at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) {
 		if (at_head)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jack@xxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/bfq-split-shared-queues-on-move-between-cgroups.patch
queue-5.10/ext4-avoid-cycles-in-directory-h-tree.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-get-rid-of-__bio_blkcg-usage.patch
queue-5.10/ext4-fix-bug_on-in-__es_tree_search.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-track-whether-bfq_group-is-still-online.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-make-sure-bfqg-for-which-we-are-queueing-requests-is-online.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-drop-pointless-unlock-lock-pair.patch
queue-5.10/ext4-fix-bug_on-in-ext4_writepages.patch
queue-5.10/dax-fix-cache-flush-on-pmd-mapped-pages.patch
queue-5.10/fsnotify-fix-wrong-lockdep-annotations.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-avoid-merging-queues-with-different-parents.patch
queue-5.10/inotify-show-inotify-mask-flags-in-proc-fdinfo.patch
queue-5.10/ext4-fix-use-after-free-in-ext4_rename_dir_prepare.patch
queue-5.10/fs-writeback-writeback_sb_inodes-recalculate-wrote-according-skipped-pages.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-remove-pointless-bfq_init_rq-calls.patch
queue-5.10/ext4-verify-dir-block-before-splitting-it.patch
queue-5.10/block-fix-bio_clone_blkg_association-to-associate-with-proper-blkcg_gq.patch
queue-5.10/bfq-update-cgroup-information-before-merging-bio.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux