This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled af_unix: annote lockless accesses to unix_tot_inflight & gc_in_progress to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: af_unix-annote-lockless-accesses-to-unix_tot_inflight-gc_in_progress.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 9d6d7f1cb67cdee15f1a0e85aacfb924e0e02435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:43:28 -0800 Subject: af_unix: annote lockless accesses to unix_tot_inflight & gc_in_progress From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 9d6d7f1cb67cdee15f1a0e85aacfb924e0e02435 upstream. wait_for_unix_gc() reads unix_tot_inflight & gc_in_progress without synchronization. Adds READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() and their associated comments to better document the intent. BUG: KCSAN: data-race in unix_inflight / wait_for_unix_gc write to 0xffffffff86e2b7c0 of 4 bytes by task 9380 on cpu 0: unix_inflight+0x1e8/0x260 net/unix/scm.c:63 unix_attach_fds+0x10c/0x1e0 net/unix/scm.c:121 unix_scm_to_skb net/unix/af_unix.c:1674 [inline] unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x679/0x16b0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1817 unix_seqpacket_sendmsg+0xcc/0x110 net/unix/af_unix.c:2258 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:724 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x39a/0x510 net/socket.c:2409 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2463 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x267/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2549 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2578 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2575 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x53/0x60 net/socket.c:2575 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae read to 0xffffffff86e2b7c0 of 4 bytes by task 9375 on cpu 1: wait_for_unix_gc+0x24/0x160 net/unix/garbage.c:196 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x8e/0x16b0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1772 unix_seqpacket_sendmsg+0xcc/0x110 net/unix/af_unix.c:2258 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:724 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x39a/0x510 net/socket.c:2409 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2463 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x267/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2549 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2578 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2575 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x53/0x60 net/socket.c:2575 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae value changed: 0x00000002 -> 0x00000004 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 1 PID: 9375 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Fixes: 9915672d4127 ("af_unix: limit unix_tot_inflight") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114164328.2038499-1-eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/unix/garbage.c | 14 +++++++++++--- net/unix/scm.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/net/unix/garbage.c +++ b/net/unix/garbage.c @@ -192,8 +192,11 @@ void wait_for_unix_gc(void) { /* If number of inflight sockets is insane, * force a garbage collect right now. + * Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in unix_inflight(), + * unix_notinflight() and gc_in_progress(). */ - if (unix_tot_inflight > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC && !gc_in_progress) + if (READ_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight) > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC && + !READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress)) unix_gc(); wait_event(unix_gc_wait, gc_in_progress == false); } @@ -213,7 +216,9 @@ void unix_gc(void) if (gc_in_progress) goto out; - gc_in_progress = true; + /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */ + WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true); + /* First, select candidates for garbage collection. Only * in-flight sockets are considered, and from those only ones * which don't have any external reference. @@ -299,7 +304,10 @@ void unix_gc(void) /* All candidates should have been detached by now. */ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&gc_candidates)); - gc_in_progress = false; + + /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */ + WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, false); + wake_up(&unix_gc_wait); out: --- a/net/unix/scm.c +++ b/net/unix/scm.c @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ void unix_inflight(struct user_struct *u } else { BUG_ON(list_empty(&u->link)); } - unix_tot_inflight++; + /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc() */ + WRITE_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight, unix_tot_inflight + 1); } user->unix_inflight++; spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock); @@ -80,7 +81,8 @@ void unix_notinflight(struct user_struct if (atomic_long_dec_and_test(&u->inflight)) list_del_init(&u->link); - unix_tot_inflight--; + /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc() */ + WRITE_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight, unix_tot_inflight - 1); } user->unix_inflight--; spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-5.10/ipv4-avoid-quadratic-behavior-in-netns-dismantle.patch queue-5.10/af_unix-annote-lockless-accesses-to-unix_tot_inflight-gc_in_progress.patch queue-5.10/ipv4-update-fib_info_cnt-under-spinlock-protection.patch queue-5.10/ppp-ensure-minimum-packet-size-in-ppp_write.patch queue-5.10/xfrm-fix-a-small-bug-in-xfrm_sa_len.patch