This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled scsi: ufs: core: Fix task management completion to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: scsi-ufs-core-fix-task-management-completion.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From f5ef336fd2e4c36dedae4e7ca66cf5349d6fda62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:10:59 +0300 Subject: scsi: ufs: core: Fix task management completion From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> commit f5ef336fd2e4c36dedae4e7ca66cf5349d6fda62 upstream. The UFS driver uses blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() when identifying task management requests to complete, however blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() doesn't work. blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() only iterates requests dispatched by the block layer. That appears as if it might have started since commit 37f4a24c2469 ("blk-mq: centralise related handling into blk_mq_get_driver_tag") which removed 'data->hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] = rq' from blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() which gets called: blk_get_request blk_mq_alloc_request __blk_mq_alloc_request blk_mq_rq_ctx_init Since UFS task management requests are not dispatched by the block layer, hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] remains NULL, and since blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() relies on finding requests using hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag], UFS task management requests are never found by blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(). By using blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(), the UFS driver was relying on internal details of the block layer, which was fragile and subsequently got broken. Fix by removing the use of blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() and having the driver keep track of task management requests. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210922091059.4040-1-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx Fixes: 1235fc569e0b ("scsi: ufs: core: Fix task management request completion timeout") Fixes: 69a6c269c097 ("scsi: ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to allocate and free TMFs") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> [Adrian: Backport to v5.10] Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -6099,27 +6099,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_check_errors(s return retval; } -struct ctm_info { - struct ufs_hba *hba; - unsigned long pending; - unsigned int ncpl; -}; - -static bool ufshcd_compl_tm(struct request *req, void *priv, bool reserved) -{ - struct ctm_info *const ci = priv; - struct completion *c; - - WARN_ON_ONCE(reserved); - if (test_bit(req->tag, &ci->pending)) - return true; - ci->ncpl++; - c = req->end_io_data; - if (c) - complete(c); - return true; -} - /** * ufshcd_tmc_handler - handle task management function completion * @hba: per adapter instance @@ -6130,14 +6109,22 @@ static bool ufshcd_compl_tm(struct reque */ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_tmc_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba) { - struct request_queue *q = hba->tmf_queue; - struct ctm_info ci = { - .hba = hba, - .pending = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL), - }; + unsigned long pending, issued; + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; + int tag; + + pending = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL); + + issued = hba->outstanding_tasks & ~pending; + for_each_set_bit(tag, &issued, hba->nutmrs) { + struct request *req = hba->tmf_rqs[tag]; + struct completion *c = req->end_io_data; - blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(q->tag_set, ufshcd_compl_tm, &ci); - return ci.ncpl ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; + complete(c); + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + return ret; } /** @@ -6267,9 +6254,9 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufshcd_hold(hba, false); spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags); - blk_mq_start_request(req); task_tag = req->tag; + hba->tmf_rqs[req->tag] = req; treq->req_header.dword_0 |= cpu_to_be32(task_tag); memcpy(hba->utmrdl_base_addr + task_tag, treq, sizeof(*treq)); @@ -6313,6 +6300,7 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct } spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); + hba->tmf_rqs[req->tag] = NULL; __clear_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_tasks); spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); @@ -9235,6 +9223,12 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, voi err = PTR_ERR(hba->tmf_queue); goto free_tmf_tag_set; } + hba->tmf_rqs = devm_kcalloc(hba->dev, hba->nutmrs, + sizeof(*hba->tmf_rqs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!hba->tmf_rqs) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto free_tmf_queue; + } /* Reset the attached device */ ufshcd_vops_device_reset(hba); --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ struct ufs_hba { struct blk_mq_tag_set tmf_tag_set; struct request_queue *tmf_queue; + struct request **tmf_rqs; struct uic_command *active_uic_cmd; struct mutex uic_cmd_mutex; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx are queue-5.10/scsi-ufs-core-fix-task-management-completion.patch queue-5.10/scsi-ufs-core-fix-task-management-completion-timeout-race.patch