This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: drm-i915-guc-fix-outstanding-g2h-accounting.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 669b949c1a44d0cb2bcd18ff6ab4fd0c21e7cf6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:47:23 -0700 Subject: drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx> commit 669b949c1a44d0cb2bcd18ff6ab4fd0c21e7cf6f upstream. A small race that could result in incorrect accounting of the number of outstanding G2H. Basically prior to this patch we did not increment the number of outstanding G2H if we encoutered a GT reset while sending a H2G. This was incorrect as the context state had already been updated to anticipate a G2H response thus the counter should be incremented. As part of this change we remove a legacy (now unused) path that was the last caller requiring a G2H response that was not guaranteed to loop. This allows us to simplify the accounting as we don't need to handle the case where the send fails due to the channel being busy. Also always use helper when decrementing this value. v2 (Daniele): update GEM_BUG_ON check, pull in dead code removal from later patch, remove loop param from context_deregister. Fixes: f4eb1f3fe946 ("drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer") Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210909164744.31249-3-matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 79 ++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c @@ -352,20 +352,29 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_register xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags); } +static void decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc) +{ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h)) + wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq); +} + static int guc_submission_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len, u32 g2h_len_dw, bool loop) { - int err; - - err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop); + /* + * We always loop when a send requires a reply (i.e. g2h_len_dw > 0), + * so we don't handle the case where we don't get a reply because we + * aborted the send due to the channel being busy. + */ + GEM_BUG_ON(g2h_len_dw && !loop); - if (!err && g2h_len_dw) + if (g2h_len_dw) atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h); - return err; + return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop); } int intel_guc_wait_for_pending_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, @@ -616,7 +625,7 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstandi init_sched_state(ce); if (pending_enable || destroyed || deregister) { - atomic_dec(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h); + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc); if (deregister) guc_signal_context_fence(ce); if (destroyed) { @@ -635,7 +644,7 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstandi intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(ce->engine); } intel_context_sched_disable_unpin(ce); - atomic_dec(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h); + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc); spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); guc_blocked_fence_complete(ce); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); @@ -1233,8 +1242,7 @@ static int register_context(struct intel } static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc, - u32 guc_id, - bool loop) + u32 guc_id) { u32 action[] = { INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, @@ -1243,16 +1251,16 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_conte return guc_submission_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, - loop); + true); } -static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id, bool loop) +static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id) { struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce); trace_intel_context_deregister(ce); - return __guc_action_deregister_context(guc, guc_id, loop); + return __guc_action_deregister_context(guc, guc_id); } static intel_engine_mask_t adjust_engine_mask(u8 class, intel_engine_mask_t mask) @@ -1340,26 +1348,23 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel * registering this context. */ if (context_registered) { + bool disabled; + unsigned long flags; + trace_intel_context_steal_guc_id(ce); - if (!loop) { + GEM_BUG_ON(!loop); + + /* Seal race with Reset */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); + disabled = submission_disabled(guc); + if (likely(!disabled)) { set_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce); intel_context_get(ce); - } else { - bool disabled; - unsigned long flags; - - /* Seal race with Reset */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); - disabled = submission_disabled(guc); - if (likely(!disabled)) { - set_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce); - intel_context_get(ce); - } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); - if (unlikely(disabled)) { - reset_lrc_desc(guc, desc_idx); - return 0; /* Will get registered later */ - } + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); + if (unlikely(disabled)) { + reset_lrc_desc(guc, desc_idx); + return 0; /* Will get registered later */ } /* @@ -1367,13 +1372,9 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel * context whose guc_id was stolen. */ with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref) - ret = deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id, loop); - if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) { - clr_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce); - intel_context_put(ce); - } else if (unlikely(ret == -ENODEV)) { + ret = deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id); + if (unlikely(ret == -ENODEV)) ret = 0; /* Will get registered later */ - } } else { with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref) ret = register_context(ce, loop); @@ -1730,7 +1731,7 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(st GEM_BUG_ON(context_enabled(ce)); clr_context_registered(ce); - deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id, true); + deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id); } static void __guc_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce) @@ -2583,12 +2584,6 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc return ce; } -static void decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc) -{ - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h)) - wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq); -} - int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *msg, u32 len) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx are queue-5.15/drm-i915-guc-don-t-drop-ce-guc_active.lock-when-unwinding-context.patch queue-5.15/drm-i915-guc-workaround-reset-g2h-is-received-after-schedule-done-g2h.patch queue-5.15/drm-i915-guc-fix-outstanding-g2h-accounting.patch queue-5.15/drm-i915-guc-don-t-enable-scheduling-on-a-banned-context-guc_id-invalid-not-registered.patch queue-5.15/drm-i915-guc-unwind-context-requests-in-reverse-order.patch