This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clear HWP desired on suspend/shutdown and offline
to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-intel_pstate-clear-hwp-desired-on-suspend-sh.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit a8e640754ea0b889c294775082f1bcc0c173231a
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Nov 3 19:43:47 2021 +0100
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clear HWP desired on suspend/shutdown and offline
[ Upstream commit dbea75fe18f60e364de6d994fc938a24ba249d81 ]
Commit a365ab6b9dfb ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the
->adjust_perf() callback") caused intel_pstate to use nonzero HWP
desired values in certain usage scenarios, but it did not prevent
them from being leaked into the confugirations in which HWP desired
is expected to be 0.
The failing scenarios are switching the driver from the passive
mode to the active mode and starting a new kernel via kexec() while
intel_pstate is running in the passive mode.
To address this issue, ensure that HWP desired will be cleared on
offline and suspend/shutdown.
Fixes: a365ab6b9dfb ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback")
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index fc7a429f22d33..dafa631582bac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -999,9 +999,16 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_offline(struct cpudata *cpu)
*/
value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24);
value |= HWP_ENERGY_PERF_PREFERENCE(cpu->epp_cached);
- WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value);
}
+ /*
+ * Clear the desired perf field in the cached HWP request value to
+ * prevent nonzero desired values from being leaked into the active
+ * mode.
+ */
+ value &= ~HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L);
+ WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value);
+
value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 0);
min_perf = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_cap_cached));
@@ -2903,6 +2910,27 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return intel_pstate_cpu_exit(policy);
}
+static int intel_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ intel_pstate_suspend(policy);
+
+ if (hwp_active) {
+ struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
+ u64 value = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached);
+
+ /*
+ * Clear the desired perf field in MSR_HWP_REQUEST in case
+ * intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf() is in use and the last value
+ * written by it may not be suitable.
+ */
+ value &= ~HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L);
+ wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value);
+ WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct cpufreq_driver intel_cpufreq = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
.verify = intel_cpufreq_verify_policy,
@@ -2912,7 +2940,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_cpufreq = {
.exit = intel_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
.offline = intel_cpufreq_cpu_offline,
.online = intel_pstate_cpu_online,
- .suspend = intel_pstate_suspend,
+ .suspend = intel_cpufreq_suspend,
.resume = intel_pstate_resume,
.update_limits = intel_pstate_update_limits,
.name = "intel_cpufreq",
