Patch "tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function

to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tcp_bpf-fix-one-concurrency-problem-in-the-tcp_bpf_send_verdict-function.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From cd9733f5d75c94a32544d6ce5be47e14194cf137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:20:19 +0800
Subject: tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function

From: Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit cd9733f5d75c94a32544d6ce5be47e14194cf137 upstream.

With two Msgs, msgA and msgB and a user doing nonblocking sendmsg calls (or
multiple cores) on a single socket 'sk' we could get the following flow.

 msgA, sk                               msgB, sk
 -----------                            ---------------
 tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
 lock(sk)
 psock = sk->psock
                                        tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
                                        lock(sk) ... blocking
tcp_bpf_send_verdict
if (psock->eval == NONE)
   psock->eval = sk_psock_msg_verdict
 ..
 < handle SK_REDIRECT case >
   release_sock(sk)                     < lock dropped so grab here >
   ret = tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir
                                        psock = sk->psock
                                        tcp_bpf_send_verdict
 lock_sock(sk) ... blocking on B
                                        if (psock->eval == NONE) <- boom.
                                         psock->eval will have msgA state

The problem here is we dropped the lock on msgA and grabbed it with msgB.
Now we have old state in psock and importantly psock->eval has not been
cleared. So msgB will run whatever action was done on A and the verdict
program may never see it.

Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012052019.184398-1-liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_send_verdict(struct s
 	bool cork = false, enospc = sk_msg_full(msg);
 	struct sock *sk_redir;
 	u32 tosend, delta = 0;
+	u32 eval = __SK_NONE;
 	int ret;
 
 more_data:
@@ -356,13 +357,24 @@ more_data:
 	case __SK_REDIRECT:
 		sk_redir = psock->sk_redir;
 		sk_msg_apply_bytes(psock, tosend);
+		if (!psock->apply_bytes) {
+			/* Clean up before releasing the sock lock. */
+			eval = psock->eval;
+			psock->eval = __SK_NONE;
+			psock->sk_redir = NULL;
+		}
 		if (psock->cork) {
 			cork = true;
 			psock->cork = NULL;
 		}
 		sk_msg_return(sk, msg, tosend);
 		release_sock(sk);
+
 		ret = tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(sk_redir, msg, tosend, flags);
+
+		if (eval == __SK_REDIRECT)
+			sock_put(sk_redir);
+
 		lock_sock(sk);
 		if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
 			int free = sk_msg_free_nocharge(sk, msg);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.4/tcp_bpf-fix-one-concurrency-problem-in-the-tcp_bpf_send_verdict-function.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux