Patch "perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit inside the guest" has been added to the 5.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit inside the guest

to the 5.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     perf-x86-amd-don-t-touch-the-amd64_eventsel_hostonly-bit-inside-the-guest.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From df51fe7ea1c1c2c3bfdb81279712fdd2e4ea6c27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:08:50 +0800
Subject: perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit inside the guest

From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit df51fe7ea1c1c2c3bfdb81279712fdd2e4ea6c27 upstream.

If we use "perf record" in an AMD Milan guest, dmesg reports a #GP
warning from an unchecked MSR access error on MSR_F15H_PERF_CTLx:

  [] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010200 (tried to write 0x0000020000110076) at rIP: 0xffffffff8106ddb4 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)
  [] Call Trace:
  []  amd_pmu_disable_event+0x22/0x90
  []  x86_pmu_stop+0x4c/0xa0
  []  x86_pmu_del+0x3a/0x140

The AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit is defined and used on the host,
while the guest perf driver should avoid such use.

Fixes: 1018faa6cf23 ("perf/x86/kvm: Fix Host-Only/Guest-Only counting with SVM disabled")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210802070850.35295-1-likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1115,9 +1115,10 @@ void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *eve
 
 static inline void x86_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	u64 disable_mask = __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.perf_ctr_virt_mask);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config);
+	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config & ~disable_mask);
 
 	if (is_counter_pair(hwc))
 		wrmsrl(x86_pmu_config_addr(hwc->idx + 1), 0);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.13/perf-x86-amd-don-t-touch-the-amd64_eventsel_hostonly-bit-inside-the-guest.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux