Patch "sctp: move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sctp: move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sctp-move-198-addresses-from-unusable-to-private-sco.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit ca1fdf09e48c6f5dc7f90cd2c87db45024319b36
Author: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jun 29 23:34:08 2021 -0400

    sctp: move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope
    
    [ Upstream commit 1d11fa231cabeae09a95cb3e4cf1d9dd34e00f08 ]
    
    The doc draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctp-ipv4-00 that restricts 198 addresses
    was never published. These addresses as private addresses should be
    allowed to use in SCTP.
    
    As Michael Tuexen suggested, this patch is to move 198 addresses from
    unusable to private scope.
    
    Reported-by: Sérgio <surkamp@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/constants.h b/include/net/sctp/constants.h
index d4da07048aa3..cbf96458ce22 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/constants.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/constants.h
@@ -348,8 +348,7 @@ enum {
 #define SCTP_SCOPE_POLICY_MAX	SCTP_SCOPE_POLICY_LINK
 
 /* Based on IPv4 scoping <draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctp-ipv4-00.txt>,
- * SCTP IPv4 unusable addresses: 0.0.0.0/8, 224.0.0.0/4, 198.18.0.0/24,
- * 192.88.99.0/24.
+ * SCTP IPv4 unusable addresses: 0.0.0.0/8, 224.0.0.0/4, 192.88.99.0/24.
  * Also, RFC 8.4, non-unicast addresses are not considered valid SCTP
  * addresses.
  */
@@ -357,7 +356,6 @@ enum {
 	((htonl(INADDR_BROADCAST) == a) ||  \
 	 ipv4_is_multicast(a) ||	    \
 	 ipv4_is_zeronet(a) ||		    \
-	 ipv4_is_test_198(a) ||		    \
 	 ipv4_is_anycast_6to4(a))
 
 /* Flags used for the bind address copy functions.  */
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index d5cf05efddfd..868b97607601 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -423,7 +423,8 @@ static enum sctp_scope sctp_v4_scope(union sctp_addr *addr)
 		retval = SCTP_SCOPE_LINK;
 	} else if (ipv4_is_private_10(addr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr) ||
 		   ipv4_is_private_172(addr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr) ||
-		   ipv4_is_private_192(addr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr)) {
+		   ipv4_is_private_192(addr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr) ||
+		   ipv4_is_test_198(addr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr)) {
 		retval = SCTP_SCOPE_PRIVATE;
 	} else {
 		retval = SCTP_SCOPE_GLOBAL;



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux