This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pwm: sprd: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped
to the 5.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pwm-sprd-ensure-configuring-period-and-duty_cycle-is.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 532d2b8d4eb9874ee48994367547ba1985cceb90
Author: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jul 1 10:27:51 2021 +0200
pwm: sprd: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped
[ Upstream commit 65e2e6c1c20104ed19060a38f4edbf14e9f9a9a5 ]
As the last call to sprd_pwm_apply() might have exited early if
state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in
pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be
ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM.
Fixes: 8aae4b02e8a6 ("pwm: sprd: Add Spreadtrum PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c
index 98c479dfae31..3041f0b3bbb6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c
@@ -183,13 +183,10 @@ static int sprd_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
}
}
- if (state->period != cstate->period ||
- state->duty_cycle != cstate->duty_cycle) {
- ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
- state->period);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
+ state->period);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
sprd_pwm_write(spc, pwm->hwpwm, SPRD_PWM_ENABLE, 1);
} else if (cstate->enabled) {
