This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled pwm: sprd: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped to the 5.13-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: pwm-sprd-ensure-configuring-period-and-duty_cycle-is.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.13 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 532d2b8d4eb9874ee48994367547ba1985cceb90 Author: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jul 1 10:27:51 2021 +0200 pwm: sprd: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped [ Upstream commit 65e2e6c1c20104ed19060a38f4edbf14e9f9a9a5 ] As the last call to sprd_pwm_apply() might have exited early if state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM. Fixes: 8aae4b02e8a6 ("pwm: sprd: Add Spreadtrum PWM support") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c index 98c479dfae31..3041f0b3bbb6 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sprd.c @@ -183,13 +183,10 @@ static int sprd_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, } } - if (state->period != cstate->period || - state->duty_cycle != cstate->duty_cycle) { - ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle, - state->period); - if (ret) - return ret; - } + ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle, + state->period); + if (ret) + return ret; sprd_pwm_write(spc, pwm->hwpwm, SPRD_PWM_ENABLE, 1); } else if (cstate->enabled) {