This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation
to the 5.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfsv4-pnfs-fix-layoutget-behaviour-after-invalidatio.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 9d0cd6fa01cd0f2e78ab9887c1db093b07e446a7
Author: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jul 2 19:48:41 2021 -0400
NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation
[ Upstream commit 0b77f97a7e42adc72bd566ff8cb733ea426f74f6 ]
If the layout gets invalidated, we should wait for any outstanding
layoutget requests for that layout to complete, and we should resend
them only after re-establishing the layout stateid.
Fixes: d29b468da4f9 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index ffe02e43f8c0..be960e47d7f6 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ lookup_again:
* If the layout segment list is empty, but there are outstanding
* layoutget calls, then they might be subject to a layoutrecall.
*/
- if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
+ if ((list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) || !pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) &&
atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) != 0) {
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
lseg = ERR_PTR(wait_var_event_killable(&lo->plh_outstanding,
@@ -2390,11 +2390,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
goto out_forget;
}
+ if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && !pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+ goto out_forget;
+
if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) {
/* existing state ID, make sure the sequence number matches. */
if (pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(lo, &res->stateid)) {
- if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) &&
- pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+ if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo))
lo->plh_barrier = 0;
dprintk("%s forget reply due to sequence\n", __func__);
goto out_forget;
@@ -2413,8 +2415,6 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
goto out_forget;
} else {
/* We have a completely new layout */
- if (!pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
- goto out_forget;
pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true);
}
