Patch "s390/mem_detect: fix diag260() program check new psw handling" has been added to the 5.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    s390/mem_detect: fix diag260() program check new psw handling

to the 5.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     s390-mem_detect-fix-diag260-program-check-new-psw-ha.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 9a1e3f6c0dd925ee74f877e9fe0c3bbfc5a8bc6f
Author: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Jun 14 21:40:43 2021 +0200

    s390/mem_detect: fix diag260() program check new psw handling
    
    [ Upstream commit 86807f348f418a84970eebb8f9912a7eea16b497 ]
    
    The __diag260() inline asm temporarily changes the program check new
    psw to redirect a potential program check on the diag instruction.
    Restoring of the program check new psw is done in C code behind the
    inline asm.
    
    This can be problematic, especially if the function is inlined, since
    the compiler can reorder instructions in such a way that a different
    instruction, which may result in a program check, might be executed
    before the program check new psw has been restored.
    
    To avoid such a scenario move restoring into the inline asm. For
    consistency reasons move also saving of the original program check new
    psw into the inline asm.
    
    Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c b/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
index 40168e59abd3..3f093556dc3b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
@@ -69,24 +69,27 @@ static int __diag260(unsigned long rx1, unsigned long rx2)
 	register unsigned long _ry asm("4") = 0x10; /* storage configuration */
 	int rc = -1;				    /* fail */
 	unsigned long reg1, reg2;
-	psw_t old = S390_lowcore.program_new_psw;
+	psw_t old;
 
 	asm volatile(
+		"	mvc	0(16,%[psw_old]),0(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	epsw	%0,%1\n"
-		"	st	%0,%[psw_pgm]\n"
-		"	st	%1,%[psw_pgm]+4\n"
+		"	st	%0,0(%[psw_pgm])\n"
+		"	st	%1,4(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	larl	%0,1f\n"
-		"	stg	%0,%[psw_pgm]+8\n"
+		"	stg	%0,8(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	diag	%[rx],%[ry],0x260\n"
 		"	ipm	%[rc]\n"
 		"	srl	%[rc],28\n"
-		"1:\n"
+		"1:	mvc	0(16,%[psw_pgm]),0(%[psw_old])\n"
 		: "=&d" (reg1), "=&a" (reg2),
-		  [psw_pgm] "=Q" (S390_lowcore.program_new_psw),
+		  "+Q" (S390_lowcore.program_new_psw),
+		  "=Q" (old),
 		  [rc] "+&d" (rc), [ry] "+d" (_ry)
-		: [rx] "d" (_rx1), "d" (_rx2)
+		: [rx] "d" (_rx1), "d" (_rx2),
+		  [psw_old] "a" (&old),
+		  [psw_pgm] "a" (&S390_lowcore.program_new_psw)
 		: "cc", "memory");
-	S390_lowcore.program_new_psw = old;
 	return rc == 0 ? _ry : -1;
 }
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux